Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Secondary zoonotic dog-to-human transmission of SARS-CoV-2 suggested by timeline but refuted by viral genome sequencing.
Hoppe, John M; Füeßl, Louise U; Hartmann, Katrin; Hofmann-Lehmann, Regina; Graf, Alexander; Krebs, Stefan; Blum, Helmut; Badell, Irina; Keppler, Oliver T; Muenchhoff, Maximilian.
  • Hoppe JM; Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Division of Nephrology, LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany. john.hoppe@med.uni-muenchen.de.
  • Füeßl LU; Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik IV, Division of Nephrology, LMU Klinikum, Munich, Germany.
  • Hartmann K; Medizinische Kleintierklinik, Zentrum für Klinische Tiermedizin, LMU München, Munich, Germany.
  • Hofmann-Lehmann R; Clinical Laboratory, Department of Clinical Diagnostics and Services, and Center for Clinical Studies, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Graf A; Laboratory for Functional Genome Analysis, Gene Center, LMU München, Munich, Germany.
  • Krebs S; Laboratory for Functional Genome Analysis, Gene Center, LMU München, Munich, Germany.
  • Blum H; Laboratory for Functional Genome Analysis, Gene Center, LMU München, Munich, Germany.
  • Badell I; Max von Pettenkofer Institute and Gene Center, Virology, National Reference Center for Retroviruses, LMU München, Munich, Germany.
  • Keppler OT; Max von Pettenkofer Institute and Gene Center, Virology, National Reference Center for Retroviruses, LMU München, Munich, Germany.
  • Muenchhoff M; German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Partner Site, Munich, Germany.
Infection ; 2022 Aug 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2231037
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

The risk of secondary zoonotic transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from pet animals remains unclear. Here, we report on a 44 year old Caucasian male presenting to our clinic with COVID-19 pneumonia, who reported that his dog displayed respiratory signs shortly prior to his infection. The dog tested real-time-PCR (RT-PCR) positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA and the timeline of events suggested a transmission from the dog to the patient.

METHODS:

RT-PCR and serological assays were used to confirm SARS-CoV-2 infection in the nasopharyngeal tract in the dog and the patient. We performed SARS-CoV-2-targeted amplicon-based next generation sequencing of respiratory samples from the dog and patient for sequence comparisons.

RESULTS:

SARS-CoV-2 infection of the dog was confirmed by three independent PCR-positive pharyngeal swabs and subsequent seroconversion. Sequence analysis identified two separate SARS-CoV-2 lineages in the canine and the patient's respiratory samples. The timeline strongly suggested dog-to-human transmission, yet due to the genetic distance of the canine and the patient's samples paired-transmission was highly unlikely.

CONCLUSION:

The results of this case support current knowledge about the low risk of secondary zoonotic dog-to-human transmissions of SARS-CoV-2 and emphasizes the strength of genomic sequencing in deciphering viral transmission chains.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic study Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S15010-022-01902-y

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic study Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S15010-022-01902-y