Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Protocol for a scoping review on 'surgical sabermetrics:' technology-enhanced measurement of operative non-technical skills.
Howie, Emma; Wigmore, Stephen J; Daglius Dias, Roger; Skipworth, Richard; Yule, Steven.
  • Howie E; Division of Clinical and Surgical Sciences, School of Surgery, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK ehowie@ed.ac.uk.
  • Wigmore SJ; Division of Clinical and Surgical Sciences, School of Surgery, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Daglius Dias R; Department of Surgery, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
  • Skipworth R; STRATUS Center for Medical Simulation, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  • Yule S; Department of Emergency Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
BMJ Open ; 13(2): e064196, 2023 02 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2231066
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Surgeons need high fidelity, high quality, objective, non-judgemental and quantitative feedback to measure their performance in order to optimise their performance and improve patient safety. This can be provided through surgical sabermetrics, defined as 'advanced analytics of digitally recorded surgical training and operative procedures to enhance insight, support professional development and optimise clinical and safety outcomes'. The aim of this scoping review is to investigate the assessment of surgeon's non-technical skills using sabermetrics principles, focusing on digital, automated measurements that do not require a human observer. METHODS AND

ANALYSIS:

To investigate the current methods of digital, automated measurements of surgeons' non-technical skills, a systematic scoping review will be conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines, using databases from medicine and other fields. Covidence software is used for screening of potential studies. A data extraction tool will be developed specifically for this study to evaluate the methods of measurement. Quality assurance will be assessed using Quality Assessment Tool for Diverse Designs. Multiple reviewers will be responsible for screening of studies and data extraction. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This is a review study, not using primary data, and therefore, ethical approval is not required. A range of methods will be employed for dissemination of the results of this study, including publication in journals and conference presentations.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Surgeons Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2022-064196

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Surgeons Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2022-064196