Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Investigating the usefulness of Automated Check-in Data Collection in general practice (AC DC Study): a multicentre, cross-sectional study in England.
Lawton, Sarah; Mallen, Christian; Muller, Sara; Wathall, Simon; Helliwell, Toby.
  • Lawton S; School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK s.a.lawton@keele.ac.uk.
  • Mallen C; Keele CTU, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
  • Muller S; School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
  • Wathall S; Midlands Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Stafford, Staffordshire, UK.
  • Helliwell T; School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.
BMJ Open ; 13(1): e062389, 2023 01 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2232297
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To investigate the usefulness of using automated appointment check-in screens to collect brief research data from patients, prior to their general practice consultation.

DESIGN:

A descriptive, cross-sectional study.

SETTING:

Nine general practices in the West Midlands, UK. Recruitment commenced in Autumn 2018 and was concluded by 31 March 2019.

PARTICIPANTS:

All patients aged 18 years and above, self-completing an automated check-in screen prior to their general practice consultation, were invited to participate during a 3-week recruitment period. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME

MEASURES:

The response rate to the use of the automated check-in screen as a research data collection tool was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes included responses to the two research questions and an assessment of impact of check-in completion on general practice operationalisation

RESULTS:

Over 85% (n=9274) of patients self-completing an automated check-in screen participated in the Automated Check-in Data Collection Study (61.0% (n=5653) women, mean age 55.1 years (range 18-98 years, SD=18.5)). 96.2% (n=8922) of participants answered a 'clinical' research question, reporting the degree of bodily pain experienced during the past 4 weeks 32.9% (n=2937) experienced no pain, 28.1% (n=2507) very mild or mild pain and 39.0% (n=3478) moderate, severe or very severe pain. 89.3% (n=8285) of participants answered a 'non-clinical' research question on contact regarding future research studies 46.9% (n=3889) of participants responded 'Yes, I'd be happy for you to contact me about research of relevance to me'.

CONCLUSIONS:

Using automated check-in facilities to integrate research into routine general practice is a potentially useful way to collect brief research data from patients. With the COVID-19 pandemic initiating an extensive digital transformation in society, now is an ideal time to build on these opportunities and investigate alternative, innovative ways to collect research data. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ISRCTN82531292.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: General Practice / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged / Young adult Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2022-062389

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: General Practice / COVID-19 Type of study: Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged / Young adult Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2022-062389