Covid-19 and research in conflict-affected contexts: distanced methods and the digitalisation of suffering
Qualitative Research
; 22(6):969-978, 2022.
Article
in English
| ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-2233610
ABSTRACT
This research note explores the pressing ethical challenges associated with increased online platforming of sensitive research on conflict-affected settings since the onset of Covid-19. We argue that moving research online and the ‘digitalisation of suffering' risks reducing complexity of social phenomena and omission of important aspects of lived experiences of violence or peace-building. Immersion, ‘contexting' and trust-building are fundamental to research in repressive and/or conflict-affected settings and these are vitally eclipsed in online exchanges and platforms. ‘Distanced research' thus bears very real epistemological limitations. Neither proximity not distance are in themselves liberating vectors. Nonetheless, we consider the opportunities that distancing offers in terms of its decolonial potential, principally in giving local researcher affiliates' agency in the research process and building more equitable collaborations. This research note therefore aims to propose a series of questions and launch a debate amongst interested scholars, practitioners and other researchers working in qualitative research methods in the social sciences.
Social Sciences: Comprehensive Works; Qualitative research methods; Research in conflict settings; Remote research; Digital data collection; Covid-19; Social research; Internet; Research methodology; Epistemology; Suffering; Decolonization; Qualitative research; Coronaviruses; Conflict; Medical research
Full text:
Available
Collection:
Databases of international organizations
Database:
ProQuest Central
Type of study:
Prognostic study
/
Qualitative research
Language:
English
Journal:
Qualitative Research
Year:
2022
Document Type:
Article
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS