Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Worsened Fibrostenotic Outcomes in Eosinophilic Esophagitis Patients Due to COVID-19-Related Endoscopy Cancellations.
Ocampo, Adolfo A; Dellon, Evan S.
  • Ocampo AA; Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, CB#7080, Bioinformatics Building, 130 Mason Farm Rd., Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7080, USA.
  • Dellon ES; Center for Esophageal Diseases and Swallowing, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, CB#7080, Bioinformatics Building, 130 Mason Farm Rd., Chapel Hill, NC, 27599-7080, USA. edellon@med.unc.edu.
Dig Dis Sci ; 2022 Jul 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2233914
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Indirect consequences of COVID-19 in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) are not known.

AIM:

To determine the impact of COVID-19-related endoscopy cancellations on outcomes in EoE patients.

METHODS:

In this retrospective cohort study, we assessed whether adult EoE patients who had routine endoscopy scheduled from mid-March 2020 to May 2020 (pandemic start) were canceled or proceeded, and if canceled, ultimately returned. We extracted clinical, endoscopic, and histologic data for their pre-COVID procedure as well as the next procedure performed, if a patient returned. Outcomes included histologic response (< 15 eos/hpf) and endoscopic severity. Those with delayed care were compared to those who returned as scheduled.

RESULTS:

Of 102 patients identified, 75 had procedures canceled, and 20 (27%) never returned. For the 55 who were canceled but returned, mean time between procedures was 1.1 ± 0.7 years with a delay of 0.5 ± 0.3 years. While treatment rates were similar between the pre- and delayed post-COVID EGD, more patients required a dilation after their return (71% vs 58%; p = 0.05) and their esophageal diameter had significantly decreased (16.8 mm to 15.0 mm; p < 0.001). Of 17 individuals who did not have stricture, narrowing, or dilation pre-pandemic, during their next endoscopy 5 (29%) had a stricture, 1 (6%) had a narrowing, and 7 (41%) required dilation.

CONCLUSION:

Of EoE patients with canceled endoscopies during the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, > 25% never returned for care, which is a previously unmeasured impact of the pandemic. Those who returned had > 1 year between procedures with progression of fibrotic features and need for esophageal dilation.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Long Covid Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S10620-022-07610-9

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Long Covid Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S10620-022-07610-9