Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Differences in Beliefs and Behaviors Related to COVID-19 Prevention Among Adult Current and Former Smokers and With and Without A Cancer Diagnosis.
Pebley, Kinsey; Krukowski, Rebecca A.
  • Pebley K; Department of Psychology, 5415The University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA.
  • Krukowski RA; Department of Public Health Sciences, 2358University of Virginia, College of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Am J Health Promot ; : 8901171221116067, 2022 Jul 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2234280
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Study aims included assessing differences in beliefs/behaviors about COVID-19 prevention among current and former smokers with and without cancer.

DESIGN:

A cross-sectional survey about COVID-19 beliefs/behaviors was administered from June 2020 to January 2021.

SETTING:

Survey conducted online via Qualtrics from June 2020 to January 2021.

SUBJECTS:

Participants were current (n = 101) and former (n = 102) smokers with and without cancer.

MEASURES:

Questions were related to beliefs about efficacy of and engagement in behaviors for COVID-19 prevention.

RESULTS:

Results from logistic regressions displayed that individuals with cancer were more likely to indicate using hand sanitizer with at least 60% alcohol was ineffective (OR = .12, 95% CI [.02, .65]) and avoided public transportation (OR = 1.84, 95% CI [1.04, 3.28]) compared to those without cancer. Former smokers were more likely to indicate taking vitamin C was effective (OR = .45, 95% CI [.22, .93]) and rinsing your mouth with salt water (OR = 1.89, 95% CI [1.02, 3.50]) was ineffective compared to current smokers. Current smokers were more likely to indicate not smoking was effective compared to former smokers (OR = 2.19, 95% CI [1.13, 4.24]).

CONCLUSIONS:

Counters to COVID-19 misinformation may need to be tailored to different at-risk groups based on differential beliefs and behaviors.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: Am J Health Promot Journal subject: Public Health Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 08901171221116067

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Diagnostic study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal: Am J Health Promot Journal subject: Public Health Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 08901171221116067