Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The nationwide impact of COVID-19 on life support courses. A retrospective evaluation by Resuscitation Council UK.
Thorne, C J; Kimani, P K; Hampshire, S; Hamilton-Bower, I; Begum-Ali, S; Benson-Clarke, A; Couper, K; Yeung, J; Lockey, A; Perkins, G D; Soar, J.
  • Thorne CJ; Resuscitation Council UK, Tavistock House North, Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9HR, UK.
  • Kimani PK; North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol BS10 5NB, UK.
  • Hampshire S; Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
  • Hamilton-Bower I; Resuscitation Council UK, Tavistock House North, Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9HR, UK.
  • Begum-Ali S; Resuscitation Council UK, Tavistock House North, Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9HR, UK.
  • Benson-Clarke A; Resuscitation Council UK, Tavistock House North, Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9HR, UK.
  • Couper K; Resuscitation Council UK, Tavistock House North, Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9HR, UK.
  • Yeung J; Resuscitation Council UK, Tavistock House North, Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9HR, UK.
  • Lockey A; Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
  • Perkins GD; Critical Care Unit, Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
  • Soar J; Resuscitation Council UK, Tavistock House North, Tavistock Square, London WC1H 9HR, UK.
Resusc Plus ; 13: 100366, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2236276
ABSTRACT

Aim:

To determine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Resuscitation Council UK Advanced Life Support (ALS) and Immediate Life Support (ILS) course numbers and outcomes.

Methods:

We conducted a before-after study using course data from the Resuscitation Council UK Learning Management System between January 2018 and December 2021, using 23 March 2020 as the cut-off between pre- and post-pandemic periods. Demographics and outcomes were analysed using chi-squared tests and regression models.

Results:

There were 90,265 ALS participants (51,464 pre-; 38,801 post-) and 368,140 ILS participants (225,628 pre-; 142,512 post-). There was a sharp decline in participants on ALS/ILS courses due to COVID-19. ALS participant numbers rebounded to exceed pre-pandemic levels, whereas ILS numbers recovered to a lesser degree with increased uptake of e-learning versions. Mean ALS course participants reduced from 20.0 to 14.8 post-pandemic (P < 0.001).Post-pandemic there were small but statistically significant decreases in ALS Cardiac Arrest Simulation Test pass rates (from 82.1 % to 80.1 % (OR = 0.90, 95 % CI = 0.86-0.94, P < 0.001)), ALS MCQ score (from 86.6 % to 86.0 % (mean difference = -0.35, 95 % CI -0.44 to -0.26, P < 0.001)), and overall ALS course results (from 95.2 %to 94.7 %, OR = 0.92, CI = 0.85-0.99, P = 0.023). ILS course outcomes were similar post-pandemic (from 99.4 % to 99.4 %, P = 0.037).

Conclusion:

COVID-19 caused a sharp decline in the number of participants on ALS/ILS courses and an accelerated uptake of e-learning versions, with the average ALS course size reducing significantly. The small reduction in performance on ALS courses requires further research to clarify the contributing factors.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Language: English Journal: Resusc Plus Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.resplu.2023.100366

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Language: English Journal: Resusc Plus Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.resplu.2023.100366