Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Parental decision-making on summer program enrollment: A mixed methods Covid-19 impact study.
Dugger, Roddrick; Reesor-Oyer, Layton; Beets, Michael W; Wilson, Dawn K; Weaver, Robert Glenn.
  • Dugger R; University of South Carolina, Department of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, USA.
  • Reesor-Oyer L; University of South Carolina, Department of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, USA.
  • Beets MW; University of South Carolina, Department of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, USA.
  • Wilson DK; University of South Carolina, Department of Psychology, College of Art and Sciences, USA.
  • Weaver RG; University of South Carolina, Department of Exercise Science, Arnold School of Public Health, USA. Electronic address: weaverrg@mailbox.sc.edu.
Eval Program Plann ; 97: 102200, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2257715
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The closure of childcare organizations (e.g. schools, childcare centers, afterschool programs, summer camps) during the Covid-19 pandemic impacted the health and wellbeing of families. Despite their reopening, parents may be reluctant to enroll their children in summer programming. Knowledge of the beliefs that underlie parental concerns will inform best practices for organizations that serve children.

METHODS:

Parents (n = 17) participated in qualitative interviews (October 2020) to discuss Covid-19 risk perceptions and summer program enrollment intentions. Based on interview responses to perceived Covid-19 risk, two groups emerged for analysis- "Elevated Risk (ER)" and "Conditional Risk (CR)". Themes were identified utilizing independent coding and constant-comparison analysis. Follow-up interviews (n = 12) in the Spring of 2021 evaluated the impact of vaccine availability on parent risk perceptions. Additionally, parents (n = 17) completed the Covid-19 Impact survey to assess perceived exposure (Range 0-25) and household impact (Range 2-60) of the pandemic. Scores were summed and averaged for the sample and by risk classification group.

RESULTS:

Parents overwhelmingly supported the operation of summer programming during the pandemic due to perceived child benefits. Parent willingness to enroll their children in summer programming evolved with time and was contingent upon the successful implementation of safety precautions (e.g. outdoor activities, increased handwashing/sanitizing of surfaces). Interestingly, parents indicated low exposure (ER Avg. 6.3 ± 3.1 Range [2-12], CR Avg. 7.5 ± 3.6 Range [1-14]) and moderate family impact (ER Avg. 27.1 ± 6.9 Range [20-36], CR Avg. 33.7 ± 11.4 Range [9-48]) on the impact survey.

CONCLUSION:

Childcare organizations should mandate and evaluate the implementation of desired Covid-19 safety precautions for their patrons.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Vaccines Limits: Child / Humans Language: English Journal: Eval Program Plann Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.evalprogplan.2022.102200

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Vaccines Limits: Child / Humans Language: English Journal: Eval Program Plann Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.evalprogplan.2022.102200