Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Telemedicine Use Among People With HIV in 2021: The Hybrid-Care Environment.
El-Nahal, Walid G; Chander, Geetanjali; Jones, Joyce L; Fojo, Anthony T; Keruly, Jeanne C; Manabe, Yukari C; Moore, Richard D; Gebo, Kelly A; Lesko, Catherine R.
  • El-Nahal WG; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Chander G; Department of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA; and.
  • Jones JL; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Fojo AT; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Keruly JC; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Manabe YC; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Moore RD; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Gebo KA; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.
  • Lesko CR; Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr ; 92(3): 223-230, 2023 03 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2240482
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Telemedicine use for the care of people with HIV (PWH) significantly expanded during the COVID-19 pandemic. During 2021, vaccine uptake increased and patients were encouraged to resume in-person care, resulting in a mixture of in-person and telemedicine visits. We studied how different patient populations used telemedicine in this hybrid-care environment.

METHODS:

Using observational data from patients enrolled in the Johns Hopkins HIV Clinical Cohort, we analyzed all in-person and telemedicine HIV primary care visits completed in an HIV clinic from January 1st, 2021, to December 31st, 2021. We used log-binomial regression to investigate the association between patient characteristics and the probability of completing a telemedicine versus in-person visit and the probability of completing a video versus telephone visit.

RESULTS:

A total of 5518 visits were completed by 1884 patients; 4282 (77.6%) visits were in-person, 800 (14.5%) by phone, and 436 (7.9%) by video. The relative risk (RR) of completing telemedicine vs. in-person visits was 0.65 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.47, 0.91) for patients age 65 years or older vs. age 20-39 years; 0.84 (95% CI 0.72, 0.98) for male patients vs. female patients; 0.81 (95% CI 0.66, 0.99) for Black vs. White patients; 0.62 (95% CI 0.49, 0.79) for patients in the highest vs. lowest quartile of Area Deprivation Index; and 1.52 (95% CI 1.26, 1.84) for patients >15 miles vs. <5 miles from clinic.

CONCLUSIONS:

In the second year of the pandemic, overall in-person care was used more than telemedicine and significant differences persist across subgroups in telemedicine uptake.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: HIV Infections / Telemedicine / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Vaccines Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Young adult Language: English Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Journal subject: SINDROME DA IMUNODEFICIENCIA ADQUIRIDA (AIDS) Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Qai.0000000000003124

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: HIV Infections / Telemedicine / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Vaccines Limits: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Young adult Language: English Journal: J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr Journal subject: SINDROME DA IMUNODEFICIENCIA ADQUIRIDA (AIDS) Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Qai.0000000000003124