Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Out-of-State Travel for Abortion among Texas Residents following an Executive Order Suspending In-State Services during the Coronavirus Pandemic.
Sierra, Gracia; Berglas, Nancy F; Hofler, Lisa G; Grossman, Daniel; Roberts, Sarah C M; White, Kari.
  • Sierra G; Population Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78705, USA.
  • Berglas NF; Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, Oakland, CA 94612, USA.
  • Hofler LG; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA.
  • Grossman D; Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, Oakland, CA 94612, USA.
  • Roberts SCM; Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, Oakland, CA 94612, USA.
  • White K; Population Research Center, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78705, USA.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 20(4)2023 Feb 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2245216
ABSTRACT
During the COVID-19 pandemic, existing and new abortion restrictions constrained people's access to abortion care. We assessed Texas abortion patients' out-of-state travel patterns before and during implementation of a state executive order that prohibited most abortions for 30 days in 2020. We received data on Texans who obtained abortions between February and May 2020 at 25 facilities in six nearby states. We estimated weekly trends in the number of out-of-state abortions related to the order using segmented regression models. We compared the distribution of out-of-state abortions by county-level economic deprivation and distance traveled. The number of Texas out-of-state abortions increased 14% the week after (versus before) the order was implemented (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.14; 95% CI 0.49, 2.63), and increased weekly while the order remained in effect (IRR = 1.64; 95% CI 1.23, 2.18). Residents of the most economically disadvantaged counties accounted for 52% and 12% of out-of-state abortions before and during the order, respectively (p < 0.001). Before the order, 38% of Texans traveled ≥250 miles one way, whereas during the order 81% traveled ≥250 miles (p < 0.001). Texans' long-distance travel for out-of-state abortion care and the socioeconomic composition of those less likely to travel reflect potential burdens imposed by future abortion bans.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Abortion, Induced / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ijerph20043679

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Abortion, Induced / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ijerph20043679