Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Personal protective equipment: Analysis of supply among midwives during the COVID-19 pandemic in Peru.
Valverde-Espinoza, Natalia; Barja-Ore, John; Rojas, Mirian Solis; Pérez-Silva, Margarita; Herrera-Málaga, Rocío; Angulo, Lizardo Huamán; López, Brenda Rodríguez.
  • Valverde-Espinoza N; Universidad Continental, Huancayo, Perú.
  • Barja-Ore J; Universidad Privada del Norte, Lima, Perú. Electronic address: john.barja@upn.pe.
  • Rojas MS; Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Comas, Lima, Perú.
  • Pérez-Silva M; College of Midwives of Peru, Colegio de Obstetras del Perú, Lima, Perú.
  • Herrera-Málaga R; Hospital Nacional Docente Madre Niño San Bartolomé, Lima, Perú.
  • Angulo LH; Ministry of Health, Lima, Perú.
  • López BR; Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Comas, Lima, Perú.
Midwifery ; 118: 103583, 2023 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2245966
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To report the details of provision of personal protective equipment to midwives during the COVID-19 pandemic in Peru

METHODS:

This is a non-experimental, descriptive, cross-sectional study. An online survey of 679 midwives working at public healthcare centres was conducted via questionnaires. The following aspects were outlined method of supply and frequency of delivery of personal protective equipment, type of personal protective equipment provided by the institution, and self-purchase. Furthermore, features of the midwives' workplace were described. For statistical analysis, absolute frequencies and relative proportions were used for categorical variables, and mean and standard deviation were used for numerical variables. MEASUREMENTS AND

FINDINGS:

The most important finding of this study is that a large proportion of midwives (66.6%) did not receive new personal protective equipment for each shift; 41.9% of midwives who received personal protective equipment during each shift exclusively provided services in the COVID-19 ward, whereas 27.6% did not. The least received supplies were of N95 respirator masks (41.7%) and disposable isolation suit gown (50.5%). Only a certain proportion of midwives (38.6%) were trained by their own institutions on the use of personal protective equipment. KEY

CONCLUSIONS:

The provision of personal protective equipment to midwives and training on personal protective equipment were insufficient at all workplaces. Therefore, measures must be taken to increase the supply of this material to midwives who are essential workers in reproductive health.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 / Midwifery Type of study: Observational study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: South America / Peru Language: English Journal: Midwifery Journal subject: Nursing / Obstetrics Year: 2023 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 / Midwifery Type of study: Observational study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: South America / Peru Language: English Journal: Midwifery Journal subject: Nursing / Obstetrics Year: 2023 Document Type: Article