Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The indelible marks on dermatology: Impacts of COVID-19 on dermatology residency Match using the Texas STAR database.
Williams, Georgia E; Zimmerman, Jessica M; Wiggins, Claire J; Seervai, Riyad N H; Mihalic, Angela P; Ahmed, Ammar M.
  • Williams GE; Dell Medical School at the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
  • Zimmerman JM; Dell Medical School at the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA.
  • Wiggins CJ; Dell Medical School at the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA; Good Samaritan Regional Medical Center/Silver Falls Dermatology, Salem, Oregon, USA.
  • Seervai RNH; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA; Providence Portland Medical Center, Portland, Oregon, USA.
  • Mihalic AP; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.
  • Ahmed AM; Dell Medical School at the University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA. Electronic address: ammar@austin.utexas.edu.
Clin Dermatol ; 41(1): 215-218, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2246337
ABSTRACT
With changes to interview format and away rotations, the COVID-19 pandemic has reshaped the residency application process. In this retrospective cohort study of data from the nationwide Texas Seeking Transparency in Applications to Residency (STAR) survey, we sought to understand how the pandemic has affected applicants in the 2021 dermatology Match. We compared applicants in the post-COVID-19 Match year (2021) with those in pre-COVID-19 Match years (2018-2020) regarding match rates, interview costs, residency geographic connections, and number of interviews attended. A total of 439 dermatology applicants who completed the Texas STAR survey were included. There was no difference in percentage of applicants with a geographic connection to their matched program (43.88% vs 47.20%). Compared with prior cycles, applicants in the 2021 Match had a higher percentage of interview offers (96% vs 90%, P < .0001), and more applicants attended 16 or more interviews (P = .0489). Applicants in the 2021 Match reported an average savings of $5,000 compared with prior cycles. Virtual interviews offer savings for applicants but may encourage interview hoarding. Though applicants did not perform away rotations, there was no increase in geographic connection for matched applicants. Stakeholders should consider these data when evaluating the pros and cons of virtual interviewing postpandemic.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Dermatology / COVID-19 / Internship and Residency Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Long Covid Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: Clin Dermatol Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.clindermatol.2022.12.001

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Dermatology / COVID-19 / Internship and Residency Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Long Covid Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: Clin Dermatol Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.clindermatol.2022.12.001