Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The Usability, Feasibility, Acceptability, and Efficacy of Digital Mental Health Services in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Scoping Review, Systematic Review, and Meta-analysis.
Zhong, Shaoling; Yang, Xinhu; Pan, Zihua; Fan, Yu; Chen, Yanan; Yu, Xin; Zhou, Liang.
  • Zhong S; The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Yang X; The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Pan Z; The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Fan Y; The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Chen Y; The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Yu X; The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Zhou L; The Affiliated Brain Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
JMIR Public Health Surveill ; 9: e43730, 2023 02 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2246795
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

After the rapid spread of the novel SARS-CoV-2, the short-term and long-term mental health impacts of the pandemic on the public, in particular on susceptible individuals, have been reported worldwide. Although digital mental health services expand accessibility while removing many barriers to in-person therapy, their usability, feasibility, acceptability, and efficacy require continued monitoring during the initial phase of the pandemic and its aftermath.

OBJECTIVE:

In this study, we aimed to understand what mental health services are offered, whether they are practical or acceptable, and to what extent digital mental health services are effective in response to the COVID-19 pandemic across high-income and low- and middle-income countries.

METHODS:

This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guideline. We implemented searches in PubMed (MEDLINE), Embase, PsycINFO, and Cochrane databases for studies that were published between December 2019 and November 2021 and that involved the use of digital mental health services. Two review authors screened, assessed, and extracted studies independently. The protocol was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews.

RESULTS:

This review identified 7506 articles through database searching. In total, 65 (0.9%) studies from 18 countries with 67,884 participants were eligible for the scoping review. Of the 65 studies, 16 (24.6%) were included in the meta-analysis. A total of 15 (23.1%) studies measured the usability; 31 (47.7%) studies evaluated the feasibility; 29 (44.6%) studies assessed the acceptability; and 51 (78.5%) studies assessed the efficacy. Web-based programs (21/65, 32.3%), videoconferencing platforms (16/65, 24.6%), smartphone apps (14/65, 21.5%), and SMS text messaging (5/65, 7.7%) were the main techniques. Psychotherapy (44/65, 67.7%) followed by psychoeducation (6/65, 9.2%) and psychological support (5/65, 7.7%) were commonly used. The results of the meta-analysis showed that digital mental health interventions were associated with a small reduction in depressive symptoms (standardized mean difference=-0.49; 95% CI -0.74 to -0.24; P<.001) and a moderate reduction in anxiety symptoms (standardized mean difference=-0.66; 95% CI -1.23 to -1.0; P=.02) significantly.

CONCLUSIONS:

The findings suggest that digital mental health interventions may be practical and helpful for the general population, at-risk individuals, and patients with preexisting mental disorders across high-income and middle-income countries. An expanded research agenda is needed to apply different strategies for addressing diverse psychological needs and develop integrated mental health services in the post-COVID-19 era. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42022307695; https//tinyurl.com/2jcuwjym.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 / Mental Health Services Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Topics: Long Covid Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: JMIR Public Health Surveill Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 43730

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 / Mental Health Services Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Topics: Long Covid Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: JMIR Public Health Surveill Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 43730