Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The social and socio-political embeddedness of COVID-19 vaccination decision-making: A five-country qualitative interview study from Europe.
Zimmermann, Bettina M; Paul, Katharina T; Araújo, Emília R; Buyx, Alena; Ferstl, Sebastian; Fiske, Amelia; Kraus, David; Marelli, Luca; McLennan, Stuart; Porta, Vittoria; Prainsack, Barbara; Radhuber, Isabella M; Saxinger, Gertrude.
  • Zimmermann BM; Institute for Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, School of Social Sciences, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: bettina.zimmermann@unibas.ch.
  • Paul KT; Department of Political Science & Research Platform Governance of Digital Practices (DigiGov), University of Vienna, Universitätsstraße 7, 1010 Wien, Austria. Electronic address: katharina.t.paul@univie.ac.at.
  • Araújo ER; Institute of Social Sciences, Research Center on Communication Studies, University of Minho, Gualtar, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal. Electronic address: emiliararaujo@gmail.com.
  • Buyx A; Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, School of Social Sciences, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: a.buyx@tum.de.
  • Ferstl S; Department of Political Science & Research Platform Governance of Digital Practices (DigiGov), University of Vienna, Universitätsstraße 7, 1010 Wien, Austria. Electronic address: seb.ferstl@gmx.at.
  • Fiske A; Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, School of Social Sciences, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: a.fiske@tum.de.
  • Kraus D; Department of Political Science & Research Platform Governance of Digital Practices (DigiGov), University of Vienna, Universitätsstraße 7, 1010 Wien, Austria. Electronic address: a12016878@unet.univie.ac.at.
  • Marelli L; Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, University of Milan, Via Vanvitelli 32, 20129 Milan, Italy; Life Sciences & Society Lab, Centre for Sociological Research, KU Leuven, Parkstraat 45, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: luca.marelli@unimi.it.
  • McLennan S; Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, School of Social Sciences, TUM School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. Electronic address: stuart.mclennan@tum.de.
  • Porta V; Department of Experimental Oncology, IEO, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia IRCCS, Via Adamello 16, 20139 Milan, Italy. Electronic address: vittoria.porta01@universitadipavia.it.
  • Prainsack B; Department of Political Science & Research Platform Governance of Digital Practices (DigiGov), University of Vienna, Universitätsstraße 7, 1010 Wien, Austria. Electronic address: barbara.prainsack@univie.ac.at.
  • Radhuber IM; Department of Political Science, University of Vienna, Universitätsstraße 7, 1010 Wien, Austria. Electronic address: isabella.radhuber@univie.ac.at.
  • Saxinger G; Department of Political Science, University of Vienna, Universitätsstraße 7, 1010 Wien, Austria Institute of Social Anthropology, University of Bern, Lerchenweg 36, 3012 Bern, Switzerland. Electronic address: gertrude.saxinger@univie.ac.at.
Vaccine ; 41(12): 2084-2092, 2023 03 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2246837
ABSTRACT
The uptake ofCOVID-19 vaccines has varied considerably across European countries. This study investigates people's decision-making process regarding vaccination by analyzing qualitative interviews (n = 214) with residents from five European countries Austria, Germany, Italy, Portugal, and Switzerland. We identify three factors that shape vaccination decision-making individual experiences and pre-existing attitudes towards vaccination, social environment, and socio-political context. Based on this analysis, we present a typology of decision-making regarding COVID-19 vaccines, where some types present stable stances towards vaccines and others change over time. Trust in government and relevant stakeholders, broader social factors, and people's direct social environment were particularly relevant to these dynamics. We conclude that vaccination campaigns should be considered long-term projects (also outside of pandemics) in need of regular adjustment, communication and fine-tuning to ensure public trust. This is particularly pertinent for booster vaccinations, such as COVID-19 or influenza.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Influenza Vaccines / Vaccines / COVID-19 Type of study: Qualitative research Topics: Vaccines Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: Vaccine Year: 2023 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Influenza Vaccines / Vaccines / COVID-19 Type of study: Qualitative research Topics: Vaccines Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Europa Language: English Journal: Vaccine Year: 2023 Document Type: Article