Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Pregnant Women's experiences with intimate partner violence one year after the COVID-19 pandemic in Jordan.
Abujilban, Sanaa; AbuAbed, Asma'a; Mrayan, Lina; Nashwan, Abdulqadir J; Al-Modallal, Hanan; Damra, Jalal; Alrousan, Dheaya; Hamaideh, Shaher.
  • Abujilban S; Department of Maternal, Child and Family Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.
  • AbuAbed A; "National Woman's Health Care Center, Amman, Jordan.
  • Mrayan L; Department of Maternal, Child and Family Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.
  • Nashwan AJ; Nursing Department, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
  • Al-Modallal H; Department of Community and Mental Health Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.
  • Damra J; Department of Nursing, Fakeeh College for Medical Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
  • Alrousan D; Department of Educational Psychology and Counseling Psychology, Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.
  • Hamaideh S; Faculty of Prince AlHasan Bin Talal, The Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.
Nurs Open ; 10(7): 4286-4297, 2023 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2247961
ABSTRACT

AIM:

To assess the prevalence and compare the levels of intimate partner violence (IPV) before and during the pandemic and to identify the factors that associated with physical IPV among Jordanian pregnant women.

DESIGN:

A cross-sectional, correlational design. Women were asked to report their experience with IPV twice during and before the pandemic.

METHODS:

A convenience sampling technique was used to select pregnant women from National Woman's Health Care Center from 15 April to 1 September 2021. The Domestic Violence Questionnaire Screening Tool (DVQST) was used to assess the levels of IPV.

RESULTS:

The women (n = 232) who participated in the study experienced considerable levels of IPV before (69% control IPV, 59.90% psychological, 46.10% physical, 43.10% sexual) and during (75.90% control IPV, 64.20% psychological, 46.10% physical, 40.90% sexual) the pandemic. There were statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05) higher mean DVQST scores for control IPV and psychological IPV during the pandemic (control IPV mean = 9.78, psychological mean = 7.03) versus before the pandemic (control IPV mean = 8.95, psychological mean = 6.62). Woman's educational level, marriage duration, woman's employment status, and level of mutual understanding were inversely associated with physical IPV during the pandemic. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION IPV is a global public health problem and a major violation of human rights. The levels of control IPV and psychological IPV increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, while the levels of physical and sexual IPV stayed the same. Antenatal screening for IPV is crucial to save women and their offspring from suffering this type of violence.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Intimate Partner Violence / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: Nurs Open Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Nop2.1669

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Intimate Partner Violence / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: Nurs Open Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Nop2.1669