Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Principal Investigators' Priorities and Perceived Barriers and Facilitators When Making Decisions About Conducting Essential Research in the COVID-19 Pandemic.
Antes, Alison L; McIntosh, Tristan J; Solomon Cargill, Stephanie; Bruton, Samuel; Baldwin, Kari.
  • Antes AL; Bioethics Research Center, Division of General Medical Sciences, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. aantes@wustl.edu.
  • McIntosh TJ; Bioethics Research Center, Division of General Medical Sciences, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  • Solomon Cargill S; Gnaegi Center for Health Care Ethics, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  • Bruton S; Castle IRB, Chesterfield, MO, USA.
  • Baldwin K; School of Humanities, University of Southern Mississippi, Hattiesburg, MS, USA.
Sci Eng Ethics ; 29(2): 8, 2023 03 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2249963
ABSTRACT
At the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States, stay-at-home orders disrupted normal research operations. Principal investigators (PIs) had to make decisions about conducting and staffing essential research under unprecedented, rapidly changing conditions. These decisions also had to be made amid other substantial work and life stressors, like pressures to be productive and staying healthy. Using survey methods, we asked PIs funded by the National Institutes of Health and the National Science Foundation (N = 930) to rate how they prioritized different considerations, such as personal risks, risks to research personnel, and career consequences, when making decisions. They also reported how difficult they found these choices and associated symptoms of stress. Using a checklist, PIs indicated those factors in their research environments that made their decisions easier (i.e., facilitators) or more difficult (i.e., barriers) to make. Finally, PIs also indicated how satisfied they were with their decisions and management of research during the disruption. Descriptive statistics summarize PIs' responses and inferential tests explore whether responses varied by academic rank or gender. PIs overall reported prioritizing the well-being and perspectives of research personnel, and they perceived more facilitators than barriers. Early-career faculty, however, rated concerns about their careers and productivity as higher priorities compared to their senior counterparts. Early-career faculty also perceived greater difficulty and stress, more barriers, fewer facilitators, and had less satisfaction with their decisions. Women rated several interpersonal concerns about their research personnel more highly than men and reported greater stress. The experience and perceptions of researchers during the COVID-19 pandemic can inform policies and practices when planning for future crises and recovering from the pandemic.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: Sci Eng Ethics Journal subject: Ethics Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S11948-023-00430-8

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: Sci Eng Ethics Journal subject: Ethics Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S11948-023-00430-8