Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Introducing dental students to complete denture treatment in times of COVID-19: Students' responses.
Bak, Sun-Yung; Saglik, Berna; Inglehart, Marita R.
  • Bak SY; Department of Biologic and Material Sciences and Prosthodontics at University of Michigan - School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Saglik B; Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, School of Dentistry & Adjunct Professor, Department of Psychology, College of Literature, Science & Arts (LS&A), University Diversity and Social Transformation Professor at the University of Michigan, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  • Inglehart MR; Department of Biologic and Material Sciences and Prosthodontics at University of Michigan - School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
J Dent Educ ; 2022 Oct 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2250946
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

The COVID-19 pandemic required changes in the complete denture courses to comply with lock-in and social distancing requirements. The objectives were to assess (a) dental students' interest in a required complete denture course and the prosthodontics specialty, (b) how much time students spent on studying background, lab, and clinical content, and (c) how difficult and helpful course components were. Additionally, open-ended responses concerning what the students liked and what they wanted to have changed were analyzed as well.

METHODS:

After this "complete denture" course, 81 of 109 students responded to a web-based survey with questions about course content and design. This hybrid course consisted of weekly asynchronous virtual lectures, in-person simulated laboratory (sim lab) exercises, and synchronous virtual workshops.

RESULTS:

Exactly 53.7% were much/very much interested in this course, with nobody considering prosthodontics as their specialty. The students studied on average of 79.61 minutes for 1 hour (of background-related lecture, 69.92 minutes for a lab-based lecture, and 77.00 minutes for a clinical-content lecture (p < 0.001). They evaluated clinical content as most difficult, lab content as less difficult, and background material as least difficult (3-point scale with 1 = not at all difficult means = 1.90/1.85/1.80; p < 0.001). They rated background lectures as least helpful, clinical material as more helpful, and lab content as most helpful (5-point scale with 1 = most helpful means = 2.33/2.67/2.96; p < 0.001). Open-ended answers showed exceptionally positive responses for content and pedagogy of sim lab and clinical content.

CONCLUSIONS:

Gaining a better understanding of students' responses to hybrid "complete denture" courses is critical for optimally teaching this material in times of COVID-19.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jdd.13117

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jdd.13117