Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Efficacy of oral amantadine among patients hospitalised with COVID-19: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study.
Barczyk, Adam; Czajkowska-Malinowska, Malgorzata; Farnik, Malgorzata; Barczyk, Marek; Boda, Lukasz; Cofta, Szczepan; Dulawa, Jan; Dyrbus, Maciej; Harat, Rafal; Huk, Maciej; Kotecka, Sylwia; Nahorecki, Artur; Nasilowski, Jacek; Naumnik, Wojciech; Przybylski, Grzegorz; Slabon-Willand, Monika; Skoczynski, Szymon; Wita, Krystian; Ziolo, Grzegorz; Kuna, Piotr.
  • Barczyk A; Department of Pneumonology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland. Electronic address: abarczyk@sum.edu.pl.
  • Czajkowska-Malinowska M; Department of Lung Diseases and Respiratory Failure, Centre of Sleep Medicine and Respiratory Care, Kuyavian-Pomeranian Pulmonology Centre, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
  • Farnik M; Department of Pneumonology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
  • Barczyk M; Department of Computer Networks and Systems, Silesian University of Technology, Gliwice, Poland.
  • Boda L; Faculty of Chemistry, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland.
  • Cofta S; Department of Respiratory Diseases, Alergology and Pulmonary Oncology, Medical University, Poznan, Poland.
  • Dulawa J; Department of Internal Medicine and Metabolic Diseases, School of Health Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
  • Dyrbus M; Temporary Hospital Pyrzowice, Poland; 3rd Department of Cardiology, School of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
  • Harat R; Department of Lung Diseases, District Hospital in Chrzanów, Chrzanów, Poland.
  • Huk M; Department of Applied Informatics, Faculty of Information and Communication Technology Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Wroclaw, Poland.
  • Kotecka S; Pharmacy "Wielkopolska", Pharmacy Group Czerniewicz, Poznan, Poland.
  • Nahorecki A; Department of Internal Medicine and Infectious Diseases, St.Lucas Hospital in Boleslawiec, Boleslawiec, Poland.
  • Nasilowski J; National Temporary Hospital, Central Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration, Warsaw, Poland; Department of Internal Medicine, Pulmonary Diseases and Allergy, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland; Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of M
  • Naumnik W; 1st Department of Lung Diseases and Chemotherapy of Respiratory Neoplasms, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland.
  • Przybylski G; Department of Lung Diseases, Neoplasms and Tuberculosis, Faculty of Medicine, Nicolaus Copernicus University Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, Bydgoszcz, Poland; The Kuyavian and Pomerania Pulmonology Center in Bydgoszcz, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
  • Slabon-Willand M; Emergency Department, Leszek Giec Upper-Silesian Medical Centre of the Silesian Medical University in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.
  • Skoczynski S; Department of Pneumonology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
  • Wita K; 1st Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medical Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
  • Ziolo G; Lubuskie Center for Pulmonology, Torzym, Poland.
  • Kuna P; Division of Internal Medicine, Asthma and Allergy, Medical University of Lodz, Poland.
Respir Med ; 212: 107198, 2023 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2251254
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Amantadine has been proposed as a treatment for COVID-19 because it shows anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity in vitro. However, to date, no controlled study has assessed the safety and efficacy of amantadine in COVID-19. RESEARCH QUESTION Whether amantadine is effective and safe among patients with different COVID-19 severity classifications. STUDY

DESIGN:

and

Methods:

This was multi-centre, randomised, placebo-controlled study.Patients with oxygen saturation ≤94% and no need for high-flow oxygen or ventilatory support were randomly allocated to receive oral amantadine or placebo (11) for 10 days in addition to standard care. The primary endpoint was time to recovery assessed over 28 days since randomisation, defined as discharge from hospital or no need for supplemental oxygen.

RESULTS:

The study was terminated early due to a lack of efficacy after an interim analysis. Final data from 95 patients who received amantadine (mean age, 60.2 years; 65% male; 66% with comorbidities) and 91 patients who received placebo (mean age, 55.8 years; 60% male; 68% with comorbidities) were obtained. The median (95% CI) time to recovery was 10 days both in the amantadine (9-11) and placebo arms (8-11; subhazard ratio = 0.94 [95%CI 0.7-1.3]). The percentage of deaths and percentage of patients who required intensive care at 14 and 28 days did not significantly differ between the amantadine and placebo groups.

INTERPRETATION:

Adding amantadine to standard care in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 did not increase the likelihood of recovery. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov; No. NCT04952519; www. CLINICALTRIALS gov.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: Respir Med Year: 2023 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Language: English Journal: Respir Med Year: 2023 Document Type: Article