Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Telehealth Rapid Access Chest Pain Clinic: Initial Experience During COVID-19 Pandemic.
Black, James A; Lees, Conor; Chapman, Niamh; Kelleher, Liam; Campbell, Julie A; Otahal, Petr; Cheng, Kevin; Marwick, Thomas H; Sharman, James E.
  • Black JA; Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
  • Lees C; Cardiology Department, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
  • Chapman N; Cardiology Department, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
  • Kelleher L; Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
  • Campbell JA; Cardiology Department, Royal Hobart Hospital, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
  • Otahal P; Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
  • Cheng K; Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
  • Marwick TH; Cardiology Department, Monash Medical Centre Clayton, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
  • Sharman JE; Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Telemed J E Health ; 2023 Mar 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2252332
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

Rapid Access Chest Pain Clinics (RACPCs) provide safe and efficient follow-up for outpatients presenting with new-onset chest pain. RACPC delivery by telehealth has not been reported. We sought to evaluate a telehealth RACPC established during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. There was a need to reduce the frequency of additional testing arranged by the RACPC during this time, and the safety of this approach was also explored.

Methods:

This was a prospective evaluation of a cohort of RACPC patients reviewed by telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with a historical control group of face-to-face consultations. The main outcomes included emergency department re-presentation at 30 days and 12 months, major adverse cardiovascular events at 12 months, and patient satisfaction scores.

Results:

One hundred forty patients seen in the telehealth clinic were compared with 1,479 in-person RACPC controls. Baseline demographics were similar; however, telehealth patients were less likely to have a normal prereferral electrocardiogram than RACPC controls (81.4% vs. 88.1%, p = 0.03). Additional testing was ordered less often for telehealth patients (35.0% vs. 80.7%, p < 0.001). Rates of adverse cardiovascular events were low in both groups. One hundred twenty (85.7%) patients reported being satisfied or highly satisfied with the telehealth clinic service.

Conclusions:

In the setting of COVID-19, a telehealth RACPC model with reduced use of additional testing facilitated social distancing and achieved clinical outcomes equivalent to a face-to-face RACPC control. Telehealth may have an ongoing role beyond the pandemic, supporting specialist chest pain assessment for rural and remote communities. Pending further study, it may be safe to reduce the frequency of additional testing following RACPC review.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal subject: Medical Informatics / Health Services Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Tmj.2022.0493

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Language: English Journal subject: Medical Informatics / Health Services Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Tmj.2022.0493