Your browser doesn't support javascript.
COVID-19 literature surveillance-A framework to manage the literature and support evidence-based decision-making on a rapidly evolving public health topic.
Corrin, Tricia; Ayache, Dima; Baumeister, Austyn; Young, Kaitlin; Pussegoda, Kusala; Ahmad, Rukshanda; Waddell, Lisa.
  • Corrin T; Public Health Risk Sciences Division, National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB.
  • Ayache D; Public Health Risk Sciences Division, National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB.
  • Baumeister A; Public Health Risk Sciences Division, National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB.
  • Young K; Public Health Risk Sciences Division, National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB.
  • Pussegoda K; Public Health Risk Sciences Division, National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB.
  • Ahmad R; Centre for Food-borne, Environmental and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Infectious Disease Prevention Branch, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.
  • Waddell L; Public Health Risk Sciences Division, National Microbiology Laboratory, Public Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, MB.
Can Commun Dis Rep ; 49(1): 5-9, 2023 Jan 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2255648
ABSTRACT

Background:

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a rapid surge of literature on severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and the wider impacts of the pandemic. Research on COVID-19 has been produced at an unprecedented rate, and the ability to stay on top of the most relevant evidence is top priority for clinicians, researchers, public health professionals and policymakers. This article presents a knowledge synthesis methodology developed and used by the Public Health Agency of Canada for managing and maintaining a literature surveillance system to identify, characterize, categorize and disseminate COVID-19 evidence daily.

Methods:

The Daily Scan of COVID-19 Literature project comprised a systematic process involving four main

steps:

literature search; screening for relevance; classification and summarization of studies; and disseminating a daily report.

Results:

As of the end of March 2022 there were approximately 300,000 COVID-19 and pandemic-related citations in the COVID-19 database, of which 50%-60% were primary research. Each day, a report of all new COVID-19 citations, literature highlights and a link to the updated database was generated and sent to a mailing list of over 200 recipients including federal, provincial and local public health agencies and academic institutions.

Conclusion:

This central repository of COVID-19 literature was maintained in real time to aid in accelerated evidence synthesis activities and support evidence-based decision-making during the pandemic response in Canada. This systematic process can be applied to future rapidly evolving public health topics that require the continuous evaluation and dissemination of evidence.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Language: English Journal: Can Commun Dis Rep Journal subject: Communicable Diseases / Epidemiology Year: 2023 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Language: English Journal: Can Commun Dis Rep Journal subject: Communicable Diseases / Epidemiology Year: 2023 Document Type: Article