Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Quantifying strategies to minimize aerosol dispersion in dental clinics.
Dey, Shamudra; Tunio, Maryam; Boryc, Louis C; Hodgson, Brian D; Garcia, Guilherme J M.
  • Dey S; Milwaukee, 53226 USA Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University, Medical College of Wisconsin.
  • Tunio M; Milwaukee, 53233 USA School of Dentistry, Marquette University.
  • Boryc LC; Milwaukee, 53233 USA School of Dentistry, Marquette University.
  • Hodgson BD; Milwaukee, 53233 USA School of Dentistry, Marquette University.
  • Garcia GJM; Milwaukee, 53226 USA Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University, Medical College of Wisconsin.
Exp Comput Multiph Flow ; 5(3): 290-303, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2257033
ABSTRACT
Many dental procedures are aerosol-generating and pose a risk for the spread of airborne diseases, including COVID-19. Several aerosol mitigation strategies are available to reduce aerosol dispersion in dental clinics, such as increasing room ventilation and using extra-oral suction devices and high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtration units. However, many questions remain unanswered, including what the optimal device flow rate is and how long after a patient exits the room it is safe to start treatment of the next patient. This study used computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to quantify the effectiveness of room ventilation, an HEPA filtration unit, and two extra-oral suction devices to reduce aerosols in a dental clinic. Aerosol concentration was quantified as the particulate matter under 10 µm (PM10) using the particle size distribution generated during dental drilling. The simulations considered a 15 min procedure followed by a 30 min resting period. The efficiency of aerosol mitigation strategies was quantified by the scrubbing time, defined as the amount of time required to remove 95% of the aerosol released during the dental procedure. When no aerosol mitigation strategy was applied, PM10 reached 30 µg/m3 after 15 min of dental drilling, and then declined gradually to 0.2 µg/m3 at the end of the resting period. The scrubbing time decreased from 20 to 5 min when the room ventilation increased from 6.3 to 18 air changes per hour (ACH), and decreased from 10 to 1 min when the flow rate of the HEPA filtration unit increased from 8 to 20 ACH. The CFD simulations also predicted that the extra-oral suction devices would capture 100% of the particles emanating from the patient's mouth for device flow rates above 400 L/min. In summary, this study demonstrates that aerosol mitigation strategies can effectively reduce aerosol concentrations in dental clinics, which is expected to reduce the risk of spreading COVID-19 and other airborne diseases.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic study Language: English Journal: Exp Comput Multiph Flow Year: 2023 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic study Language: English Journal: Exp Comput Multiph Flow Year: 2023 Document Type: Article