Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Individual-level determinants of COVID-19 vaccination in pregnant people in East Tennessee.
Ehrlich, Samantha F; Maples, Jill; Burnette, Sara; Rand, Bethany; Zite, Nikki; Paudel, Alissa; Fortner, Kimberly.
  • Ehrlich SF; Department of Public Health, The University of Tennessee Knoxville, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
  • Maples J; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
  • Burnette S; Department of Public Health, The University of Tennessee Knoxville, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
  • Rand B; Department of Public Health, The University of Tennessee Knoxville, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
  • Zite N; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
  • Paudel A; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
  • Fortner K; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tennessee Medical Center, Knoxville, Tennessee, USA.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet ; 162(1): 6-12, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2257973
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection during pregnancy increases the risk of severe illness and death. This study describes individual-level determinants of COVID-19 vaccination among pregnant people in East Tennessee.

METHODS:

Advertisements for the online Moms and Vaccines survey were placed in prenatal clinics in Knoxville, Tennessee. Determinants were compared between unvaccinated individuals and those partially or fully vaccinated for COVID-19.

RESULTS:

Wave 1 of the Moms and Vaccines study included 99 pregnant people 21 (21.2%) were unvaccinated and 78 (78.8%) were partially or fully vaccinated. Compared with the unvaccinated individuals, the partially or fully vaccinated patients more often obtained information about COVID-19 from their prenatal care provider (8 [38.1%] vs. 55 [70.5%], P = 0.006) and indicated higher levels of trust in that information (4 [19.1] vs. 69 [88.5%], P < 0.0001). Misinformation was higher in the unvaccinated group overall, although there was no difference in concern for the severity of COVID-19 infection during pregnancy by vaccination status (1 [5.0%] of the unvaccinated vs. 16 [20.8%] of the partially or fully vaccinated, P = 0.183).

CONCLUSION:

Strategies to counter misinformation are of the utmost importance, particularly pregnancy- and reproductive health-related misinformation, because of the increased risk of severe disease faced by unvaccinated pregnant individuals.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Vaccines / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Vaccines Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ijgo.14698

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Vaccines / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Vaccines Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Country/Region as subject: North America Language: English Journal: Int J Gynaecol Obstet Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ijgo.14698