Your browser doesn't support javascript.
COVID-19 vaccines reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection and hospitalization: Meta-analysis.
Flacco, Maria Elena; Acuti Martellucci, Cecilia; Baccolini, Valentina; De Vito, Corrado; Renzi, Erika; Villari, Paolo; Manzoli, Lamberto.
  • Flacco ME; Department of Environmental and Prevention Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
  • Acuti Martellucci C; Department of Environmental and Prevention Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
  • Baccolini V; Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • De Vito C; Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Renzi E; Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Villari P; Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  • Manzoli L; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 9: 1023507, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2259293
ABSTRACT
The addictive protection against SARS-CoV-2 reinfection conferred by vaccination, as compared to natural immunity alone, remains to be quantified. We thus carried out a meta-analysis to summarize the existing evidence on the association between SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and the risk of reinfection and disease. We searched MedLine, Scopus and preprint repositories up to July 31, 2022, to retrieve cohort or case-control studies comparing the risk of SARS-CoV-2 reinfection or severe/critical COVID-19 among vaccinated vs. unvaccinated subjects, recovered from a primary episode. Data were combined using a generic inverse-variance approach. Eighteen studies, enrolling 18,132,192 individuals, were included. As compared to the unvaccinated, vaccinated subjects showed a significantly lower likelihood of reinfection (summary Odds Ratio-OR 0.47; 95% CI 0.42-0.54). Notably, the results did not change up to 12 months of follow-up, by number of vaccine doses, in studies that adjusted for potential confounders, adopting different reinfection definitions, and with different predominant strains. Once reinfected, vaccinated subjects were also significantly less likely to develop a severe disease (OR 0.45; 95% CI 0.38-0.54). Although further studies on the long-term persistence of protection, under the challenge of the new circulating variants, are clearly needed, the present meta-analysis provides solid evidence of a stronger protection of hybrid vs. natural immunity, which may persist during Omicron waves and up to 12 months.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Reviews Topics: Vaccines / Variants Language: English Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Fmed.2022.1023507

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Reviews Topics: Vaccines / Variants Language: English Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Fmed.2022.1023507