Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Allergen-specific immunotherapy and COVID-19: What happened?
Furci, Fabiana; Olivieri, Bianca; Benda, Laura; Robbi, Federica; Vallicella, Sofia; Gangemi, Sebastiano; Senna, Gianenrico; Caminati, Marco.
  • Furci F; Asthma Centre and Allergy Unit, University of Verona and Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
  • Olivieri B; School and Operative Unit of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Policlinico G. Martino, University of Messina, Messina, Italy; fabianafurci@gmail.com.
  • Benda L; Department of Medicine, University of Verona and Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
  • Robbi F; Hospital Pharmacy, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
  • Vallicella S; Hospital Pharmacy, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
  • Gangemi S; Hospital Pharmacy, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
  • Senna G; School and Operative Unit of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Policlinico G. Martino, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
  • Caminati M; Asthma Centre and Allergy Unit, University of Verona and Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 51(2): 148-150, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2259772
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The COVID-19 infection played a key role in the discontinuation of patient treatment, such as allergen-specific immunotherapy, in chronic diseases.

OBJECTIVES:

We conducted a retrospective observational study at Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy, to assess the level of adherence to sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) in patients affected by allergic rhinitis and mild asthma. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We compared and analysed data related to first prescription and collection of 5-grass-pollen 300-index of reactivity (IR) SLIT and tablet lyophilisate, containing 75,000 standardized quality tablet units (SQ-T) allergen extract of grass-pollen from Phleum pratense L, for the five-year period 2017-2021.In particular we considered the group of naïve patients from 2017 who completed pre-COVID treatment (2017-2019) and the group of naïve patients from 2019 who completed treatment during the COVID period (2019-2021). The significance test used was Student's t-test, and P ˂ 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

RESULTS:

In the three-year period 2017-2019, 264 naïve patients began treatment in 2017, of these 181 continued in 2018, 135 continued in 2019. Instead, for the period 2017-2019, there were 226 naïve patients in 2019; of these 139 continued in 2020, and 102 in 2021.

CONCLUSIONS:

COVID-19 did not seem to influence adherence to SLIT, which declined independently even in during the pre-pandemic 3-year period.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal / Sublingual Immunotherapy / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Traditional medicine Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Aei.v51i2.796

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal / Sublingual Immunotherapy / COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Topics: Traditional medicine Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Aei.v51i2.796