Community consensus on core open science practices to monitor in biomedicine.
PLoS Biol
; 21(1): e3001949, 2023 01.
Article
in English
| MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2265934
ABSTRACT
The state of open science needs to be monitored to track changes over time and identify areas to create interventions to drive improvements. In order to monitor open science practices, they first need to be well defined and operationalized. To reach consensus on what open science practices to monitor at biomedical research institutions, we conducted a modified 3-round Delphi study. Participants were research administrators, researchers, specialists in dedicated open science roles, and librarians. In rounds 1 and 2, participants completed an online survey evaluating a set of potential open science practices, and for round 3, we hosted two half-day virtual meetings to discuss and vote on items that had not reached consensus. Ultimately, participants reached consensus on 19 open science practices. This core set of open science practices will form the foundation for institutional dashboards and may also be of value for the development of policy, education, and interventions.
Full text:
Available
Collection:
International databases
Database:
MEDLINE
Main subject:
Biomedical Research
Type of study:
Experimental Studies
/
Observational study
/
Prognostic study
/
Randomized controlled trials
Limits:
Humans
Language:
English
Journal:
PLoS Biol
Journal subject:
Biology
Year:
2023
Document Type:
Article
Affiliation country:
Journal.pbio.3001949
Similar
MEDLINE
...
LILACS
LIS