Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Results of the 2021-2022 Survey of the American Alliance of Academic Chief Residents in Radiology.
Khoo, Allison; Ho, Christopher; Ballard, David H; Gould, Jennifer E; Marquis, Kaitlin M.
  • Khoo A; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
  • Ho C; Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Ballard DH; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
  • Gould JE; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
  • Marquis KM; Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri. Electronic address: kmarquis@wustl.edu.
Acad Radiol ; 2023 Feb 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2266280
ABSTRACT
RATIONALE AND

OBJECTIVES:

An annual survey of chief residents in accredited North American radiology programs is conducted by the American Alliance of Academic Chief Residents in Radiology (A3CR2). Special topics surveyed for the 2021-2022 academic year were procedural competency and virtual radiology education in the COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of this study is to summarize the 2021-2022 A3CR2 chief resident survey. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

An online survey was distributed to chief residents from 197 Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education-accredited radiology residency programs. Chief residents responded to questions regarding their individual procedural readiness and attitudes on virtual radiology education. A single chief resident from each residency answered programmatic questions including the use of virtual education, faculty coverage, and fellowship choices among their graduating classes.

RESULTS:

We received 110 individual responses from 61 programs, yielding a 31% program response rate. Although the majority (80%) of programs maintained purely in-person attending readout throughout the COVID 19 pandemic, only 13% of programs reported purely in-person didactics and 26% converted to all virtual didactics. The majority (53%-74%) of chief residents perceived virtual learning (in read-out, case conference, and didactic formats) to be less effective than in-person learning. One third of chief residents reported decreased procedural exposure during the pandemic, and 7%-9% of chief residents felt uncomfortable with basic procedures (basic fluoroscopy examinations, basic aspiration/drainage procedures, and superficial biopsy procedures). The number of programs with 24/7 attending coverage increased from 35% in 2019 to 49% in 2022. Body, neuroradiology, and interventional radiology were the most popular advanced training options among graduating radiology residents.

CONCLUSION:

The COVID-19 pandemic had a profound impact on radiology training, particularly in terms of virtual learning. These survey results suggest that although digital learning offers increased flexibility, most residents still prefer in-person readout and didactics. Despite this, virtual learning will likely remain a viable option as programs continue to evolve following the pandemic.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational study Language: English Journal subject: Radiology Year: 2023 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational study Language: English Journal subject: Radiology Year: 2023 Document Type: Article