Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Protecting the public interest when regulating health professionals providing virtual care: a scoping review protocol.
Leslie, Kathleen; Myles, Sophia; Adams, Tracey L; Schiller, Catharine; Shelley, Jacob; Nelson, Sioban.
  • Leslie K; Faculty of Health Disciplines, Athabasca University, 1 University Drive, Athabasca, AB, T9S 3A3, Canada. kleslie@athabascau.ca.
  • Myles S; Faculty of Health Disciplines, Athabasca University, 1 University Drive, Athabasca, AB, T9S 3A3, Canada.
  • Adams TL; Department of Sociology, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
  • Schiller C; School of Nursing, University of Northern British Columbia, Prince George, BC, Canada.
  • Shelley J; Faculty of Law and School of Health Studies, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
  • Nelson S; Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Syst Rev ; 12(1): 31, 2023 03 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2268521
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Virtual care is transforming the nature of healthcare, particularly with the accelerated shift to telehealth and virtual care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Health profession regulators face intense pressures to safely facilitate this type of healthcare while upholding their legislative mandate to protect the public. Challenges for health profession regulators have included providing practice guidance for virtual care, changing entry-to-practice requirements to include digital competencies, facilitating interjurisdictional virtual care through licensure and liability insurance requirements, and adapting disciplinary procedures. This scoping review will examine the literature on how the public interest is protected when regulating health professionals providing virtual care.

METHODS:

This review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) scoping review methodology. Academic and grey literature will be retrieved from health sciences, social sciences, and legal databases using a comprehensive search strategy underpinned by Population-Concept-Context (PCC) inclusion criteria. Articles published in English since January 2015 will be considered for inclusion. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts and full-text sources against specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Discrepancies will be resolved through discussion or by a third reviewer. One research team member will extract relevant data from the selected documents and a second will validate the extractions.

DISCUSSION:

Results will be presented in a descriptive synthesis that highlights implications for regulatory policy and professional practice, as well as study limitations and knowledge gaps that warrant further research. Given the rapid expansion of virtual care provision by regulated health professionals in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, mapping the literature on how the public interest is protected in this rapidly evolving digital health sector may help inform future regulatory reform and innovation. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION This protocol is registered with the Open Science Framework ( https//doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/BD2ZX ).
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Prognostic study / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Syst Rev Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S13643-023-02198-1

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Pandemics / COVID-19 Type of study: Prognostic study / Reviews / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Syst Rev Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S13643-023-02198-1