Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Social support, distress and well-being in individuals experiencing Long-COVID: a cross-sectional survey study.
Lüscher, Janina; Scholz, Urte; Bierbauer, Walter.
  • Lüscher J; Swiss Paraplegic Research, Nottwil, Switzerland janina.luescher@paraplegie.ch.
  • Scholz U; Department of Psychology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
  • Bierbauer W; University Research Priority Program "Dynamics of Healthy Aging", University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
BMJ Open ; 13(3): e067166, 2023 03 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2269991
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Increasingly attention of the COVID-19 pandemic is directed towards its long-term effects, also known as Long-COVID. So far, Long-COVID was examined mainly from a medical perspective, leaving psychosocial effects of Long-COVID understudied. The present study advances the current literature by examining social support in the context of Long-COVID. The study not only examines received support reported by individuals with Long-COVID, but also provided support reported by relatives of individuals with Long-COVID.

DESIGN:

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING:

The study was conducted from June to October 2021 in Austria, Germany and the German-speaking part of Switzerland.

PARTICIPANTS:

We examined 256 individuals with Long-COVID (MAge=45.05 years, 90.2% women) and 50 relatives of individuals with Long-COVID (MAge=48.34 years, 66.1% female) in two separate online surveys, assessing social support, well-being and distress. PRIMARY OUTCOME

MEASURES:

Primary outcomes were positive and negative affect, anxiety and depressive symptoms and perceived stress.

RESULTS:

For individuals with Long-COVID, receiving emotional support was related to higher well-being (positive affect b=0.29, p<0.01; negative affect b=-0.31, p<0.05) and less distress (anxiety b=-1.45, p<0.01; depressive symptoms b=-1.04, p<0.05; perceived stress b=-0.21, p<0.05) but no effects emerged for receiving practical support. For relatives of individuals with Long-COVID, providing emotional support was only related to lower depressive symptoms (b=-2.57, p<0.05). Again, provided practical support was unrelated to the outcomes considered.

CONCLUSIONS:

Emotional support is likely to play an important role in well-being and distress of patients and relatives, whereas practical support does not seem to make a difference. Future research should clarify under what conditions different kinds of support unfold their positive effects on well-being and distress in the context of Long-COVID.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Long Covid Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2022-067166

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Long Covid Limits: Female / Humans / Male Language: English Journal: BMJ Open Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Bmjopen-2022-067166