Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Feasibility of Single - Encounter Telemedicine Lung Cancer Screening: A Retrospective Cohort Study in an Underserved Population.
Magarinos, Jessica; Lutzow, Lynde; Dass, Chandra; Ma, Grace X; Erkmen, Cherie P.
  • Magarinos J; Department of Surgery, 6558Temple University Health Systems, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Lutzow L; Department of Surgery, 6558Temple University Health Systems, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Dass C; Department of Radiology, 6558Temple University Health Systems, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Ma GX; Center for Asian Health, 12314Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Erkmen CP; Center for Asian Health, 12314Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Cancer Control ; 30: 10732748221121391, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2270280
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

COVID-19 forced a delay of non-essential health services, including lung cancer screening. Our institution developed a single-encounter, telemedicine (SET) lung cancer screening whereby patients receive low-dose CT in-person, but counseling regarding results, coordination of follow-up care and smoking cessation is delivered using telemedicine. This study compares outcomes of SET lung cancer screening to our pre-COVID, single-visit, in-person (SIP) lung cancer screening.

METHODS:

A retrospective cohort study was performed we recorded independent variables of gender, race/ethnicity, age, educational attainment, smoking status and dependent variables including cancer diagnosis, stage and treatment between March 2019 to July 2021. Using retrospective analysis, we compared outcomes of SIP lung cancer screening before COVID-19 and SET lung cancer screening amid COVID-19.

RESULTS:

There was a significant difference in number of patients screened pre- and amid COVID-19.673 people were screened via SIP, while only 440 were screened via SET. SIP screening consisted of 52.5% Black/African American patients, which decreased to 37% with SET lung cancer screening. There was no significant difference in gender, age, or educational attainment. There was also no significant difference in Lung-RADS score between the 2 methods of screening or diagnostic procedures performed. Ultimately telemedicine based screening diagnosed fewer cancers, 1.6% diagnosed via telemedicine vs 3.3% screened by in person.

CONCLUSION:

We implemented SET lung cancer screening to continue lung cancer screening during a global pandemic. Our study established feasibility of telemedicine-based lung cancer screening among our predominantly African American/Black population, though fewer patients were screened. We found no difference in distribution between age, or educational attainment suggesting other factors discouraging lung cancer screening amid COVID-19.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Telemedicine / COVID-19 / Lung Neoplasms Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Cancer Control Journal subject: Neoplasms Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 10732748221121391

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Telemedicine / COVID-19 / Lung Neoplasms Type of study: Cohort study / Diagnostic study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Cancer Control Journal subject: Neoplasms Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: 10732748221121391