Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Dyadic versus individual delivery of a yoga program for family caregivers of glioma patients undergoing radiotherapy: Results of a 3-arm randomized controlled trial.
Milbury, Kathrin; Whisenant, Meagan; Weathers, Shiao-Pei; Malliaha, Smitha; Snyder, Stella; Jackson, Natalie; Li, Jing; Li, Yisheng; Silva, Roseanglea F; Shih, Ya-Chen Tina; Cohen, Lorenzo.
  • Milbury K; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Whisenant M; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Weathers SP; The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Cizik School of Nursing, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Malliaha S; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Snyder S; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Jackson N; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Li J; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Li Y; The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Cizik School of Nursing, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Silva RF; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Shih YT; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Cohen L; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Cancer Med ; 2022 Dec 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2272154
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Despite their significant distress, supportive care interventions for caregivers of glioma patients are generally lacking. And, whether caregivers are more likely to benefit from interventions targeting patient-caregiver dyads or caregivers individually is unknown. This pilot randomized controlled trial compared the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of a dyadic yoga (DY) versus an individual caregiver yoga (CY) intervention as a supportive care strategy for family caregivers.

METHODS:

Patient-caregiver dyads were randomized to a DY, CY or usual care (UC) arm. DY and CY interventions were delivered over 15 sessions. Caregivers completed assessments of their depressive symptoms, quality of life (QOL), and caregiving reactions at baseline, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks, and a subset completed qualitative interviews at 12 weeks.

RESULTS:

With a consent rate of 63%, 67 dyads were randomized. Attendance in the DY was higher than in the CY group (session means, DY = 12.23, CY = 9.00; p = 0.06). Caregivers (79% female; 78% non-Hispanic White; mean age, 53 years) reported significantly more subjective benefit in the CY arm than in the DY arm (d = 2.1; p < .01), which was consistent with the qualitative assessment. There were medium effect sizes for improved mental QOL (d = 0.46) and financial burden (d = 0.53) in favor of the CY over the UC group. Caregivers in the CY group reported more caregiving esteem (d = 0.56) and less health decline (d = 0.60) than those in the DY group.

CONCLUSION:

Individual rather than dyadic delivery may be a superior supportive care approach for this vulnerable caregiver population. A larger, adequately powered efficacy trial is warranted.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Traditional medicine Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Cam4.5514

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Traditional medicine Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Cam4.5514