Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Piloting an interprofessional virtual cadaveric dissection course: Responding to COVID-19.
Oliveira, Ana; Wainman, Bruce; Palombella, Andrew; Rockarts, Jasmine; Wojkowski, Sarah.
  • Oliveira A; Program for Interprofessional Practice, Education and Research (PIPER), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
  • Wainman B; Respiratory Medicine, West Park Healthcare Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Palombella A; Lab3R - Respiratory Research and Rehabilitation Laboratory, School of Health Sciences, University of Aveiro (ESSUA), Aveiro, Portugal.
  • Rockarts J; iBiMED - Institute of Biomedicine, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal.
  • Wojkowski S; Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Anat Sci Educ ; 16(3): 465-472, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2274859
ABSTRACT
Interprofessional learning improves students' clinical and interprofessional competencies. COVID-19 prevented delivering in-person education and motivated the development of a virtual interprofessional cadaveric dissection (ICD) course. This study reports on the effects of a virtual ICD course compared to a previously delivered in-person course, on students' readiness for, and perceptions about, interprofessional learning. Students attending the ICD course in-person (2019-2020) or virtually (2020-2021) completed the Readiness for Interprofessional Learning Scale (RIPLS) and the Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale (IEPS). Students in the virtual course also provided written feedback. Thirty-two (24 women; Median 24 [Q1-Q3 22-25] years) and 23 students (18 women; 22 [21-23] years) attended the in-person and virtual courses, respectively. In the virtual cohort, the RIPLS total score (82 [76-87] vs. 85 [78-90]; p = 0.034) and the roles and responsibilities sub-score (11 [9-12] vs. 12 [11-13]; p = 0.001) improved significantly. In the in-person cohort, the roles and responsibilities sub-score improved significantly (12 [10-14] vs. 13 [11-14]; p = 0.017). No significant differences were observed between cohorts (p < 0.05). Themes identified in the qualitative analysis were advantages and positive experiences, competencies acquired, disadvantages and challenges, and preferences and suggestions. In-person and virtual ICD courses seem to have similar effects on students' interprofessional learning. However, students reported preferring the in-person setting for learning anatomy-dissection skills.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Students, Health Occupations / COVID-19 / Anatomy Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Female / Humans Language: English Journal: Anat Sci Educ Journal subject: Anatomy / Education Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ase.2275

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Students, Health Occupations / COVID-19 / Anatomy Type of study: Cohort study / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Female / Humans Language: English Journal: Anat Sci Educ Journal subject: Anatomy / Education Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Ase.2275