Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The Collateral Benefit of COVID Pandemic: Improved Pharmacological Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis Practices in Non-COVID Patients.
Özdede, Murat; Güven, Alper Tuna; Karadeniz Güven, Damla; Uyaroglu, Oguz Abdullah; Durusu Tanriover, Mine.
  • Özdede M; Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Güven AT; Baskent University Adana Hospitals, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Adana, Turkey.
  • Karadeniz Güven D; Adana City Hospital, Department of Pulmonology, Adana, Turkey.
  • Uyaroglu OA; Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
  • Durusu Tanriover M; Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.
Int J Gen Med ; 16: 1069-1079, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2275251
ABSTRACT

Background:

COVID-19 creates a hypercoagulable state with a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations. Of those, venous thromboembolism (VTE) is prevalent, and numerous studies have highlighted the importance of VTE prophylaxis. Pre-pandemic VTE prophylaxis practices have already been poor, despite guidelines. We hypothesized that the gap between guidelines and practices might have been closed due to increased awareness. Materials and

Methods:

Non-COVID-19 patients hospitalized in the internal medicine ward of a university hospital between January 1st, 2021, and June 30th, 2021, were assessed. VTE risk and thromboprophylaxis requirements were assessed using the Padua Prediction Score (PPS). The results were compared with the findings of the study conducted in the same setting before the pandemic.

Results:

A total of 267 patients were included, and 81 patients (30.3%) received prophylaxis. A total of 128 patients' (47.9%) PPS was ≥ 4, and 69 patients (53.9%) received prophylaxis; 12 low-risk patients (8.6%) received prophylaxis although it was not indicated. Compared to the pre-pandemic figures, both appropriate prophylaxis use and overuse rates have risen. While the increment rate of appropriate prophylaxis was statistically significant, the increment rate of overuse did not reach statistical significance. Patients hospitalized for infectious diseases and respiratory failure were more likely to receive appropriate prophylaxis.

Conclusion:

We have demonstrated a significant increase in appropriate pharmacologic prophylaxis rates among high-risk patients. Besides all the collateral damage the pandemic has created, it might also have brought collateral benefits with regards to VTE prophylaxis.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic study Language: English Journal: Int J Gen Med Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: IJGM.S404827

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic study Language: English Journal: Int J Gen Med Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: IJGM.S404827