Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Qualitative evaluation of rapid implementation of remote blood pressure self-monitoring in pregnancy during Covid-19.
Paterson, Charlotte; Jack, Elaine; McKinstry, Brian; Whyte, Sonia; Denison, Fiona C; Cheyne, Helen.
  • Paterson C; Nursing Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom.
  • Jack E; MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
  • McKinstry B; Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
  • Whyte S; Liverpool Clinical Trials Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
  • Denison FC; Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
  • Cheyne H; Nursing Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, United Kingdom.
PLoS One ; 18(3): e0278156, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2275853
ABSTRACT
In March 2020, the World Health Organisation named the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (Sars-CoV-2), which causes corona virus disease 2019 (COVID -19), as a pandemic. Pregnant women were considered at increased risk of developing severe COVID-19 after viral infection. In response maternity services reduced face-to-face consultations with high-risk pregnant women by supplying blood pressure monitors for supported self-monitoring. This paper explores the experiences of patients and clinicians of the rapid roll-out of supported self-monitoring programme in Scotland during the first and second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews with high-risk women and healthcare professionals who were using supported self-monitoring of blood pressure (BP) In four case studies during the COVID-19 pandemic. 20 women, 15 midwives and 4 obstetricians took part in the interviews. Interviews with healthcare professionals showed that while implementation occurred at pace and at scale across the National Health Service (NHS) in Scotland, implementation differed locally, resulting in mixed experiences. Study Participants observed several barriers and facilitators to implementation. Women value the simplicity of use and convenience of the digital communications platforms while health professionals were more interested in their impact on reducing workload for both women and health professionals largely found self-monitoring acceptable, with only a few exceptions. These results show that rapid change can occur in the NHS at a national level when there is a shared motivation. While self-monitoring is acceptable to most women, decisions regarding self-monitoring should be made jointly and on an individual basis.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0278156

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0278156