Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Effectiveness of first and second COVID-19 mRNA vaccine monovalent booster doses during a period of circulation of Omicron variant sublineages: December 2021-July 2022.
Petrie, Joshua G; King, Jennifer P; McClure, David L; Rolfes, Melissa A; Meece, Jennifer K; Pattinson, David; Neumann, Gabriele; Kawaoka, Yoshihiro; Belongia, Edward A; McLean, Huong Q.
  • Petrie JG; Marshfield Clinic Research Institute Marshfield Wisconsin USA.
  • King JP; Marshfield Clinic Research Institute Marshfield Wisconsin USA.
  • McClure DL; Marshfield Clinic Research Institute Marshfield Wisconsin USA.
  • Rolfes MA; Influenza Division Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Atlanta Georgia USA.
  • Meece JK; Marshfield Clinic Research Institute Marshfield Wisconsin USA.
  • Pattinson D; Department of Pathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine University of Wisconsin- Madison Wisconsin USA.
  • Neumann G; Department of Pathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine University of Wisconsin- Madison Wisconsin USA.
  • Kawaoka Y; Department of Pathobiological Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine University of Wisconsin- Madison Wisconsin USA.
  • Belongia EA; Marshfield Clinic Research Institute Marshfield Wisconsin USA.
  • McLean HQ; Marshfield Clinic Research Institute Marshfield Wisconsin USA.
Influenza Other Respir Viruses ; 17(3): e13104, 2023 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2276322
ABSTRACT

Background:

US recommendations for COVID-19 vaccine boosters have expanded in terms of age groups covered and numbers of doses recommended, whereas evolution of Omicron sublineages raises questions about ongoing vaccine effectiveness.

Methods:

We estimated effectiveness of monovalent COVID-19 mRNA booster vaccination versus two-dose primary series during a period of Omicron variant virus circulation in a community cohort with active illness surveillance. Hazard ratios comparing SARS-CoV-2 infection between booster versus primary series vaccinated individuals were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models with time-varying booster status. Models were adjusted for age and prior SARS-CoV-2 infection. The effectiveness of a second booster among adults ≥50 years of age was similarly estimated.

Results:

The analysis included 883 participants ranging in age, from 5 to >90 years. Relative effectiveness was 51% (95% CI 34%, 64%) favoring the booster compared with primary series vaccination and did not vary by prior infection status. Relative effectiveness was 74% (95% CI 57%, 84%) at 15 to 90 days after booster receipt, but declined to 42% (95% CI 16%, 61%) after 91 to 180 days, and to 36% (95% CI 3%, 58%) after 180 days. The relative effectiveness of a second booster compared to a single booster was 24% (95% CI -40% to 61%).

Conclusions:

An mRNA vaccine booster dose added significant protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection, but protection decreased over time. A second booster did not add significant protection for adults ≥50 years of age. Uptake of recommended bivalent boosters should be encouraged to increase protection against Omicron BA.4/BA.5 sublineages.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Vaccines / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Vaccines / Variants Limits: Adult / Humans Language: English Journal: Influenza Other Respir Viruses Journal subject: Virology Year: 2023 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Vaccines / COVID-19 Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials Topics: Vaccines / Variants Limits: Adult / Humans Language: English Journal: Influenza Other Respir Viruses Journal subject: Virology Year: 2023 Document Type: Article