Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Tele-visits for GERD: "Ecofriendly, efficient and effective".
Roy, Winnie; Hans, Bandhul; Jannat, Rida Ul; Reddy, Yala Kirthi; Hadi, Yousaf; Gayam, Swapna.
  • Roy W; Internal Medicine Residency, WVU Medicine Camden Clark Medical Center, Parkersburg, WV, USA.
  • Hans B; Internal Medicine Residency, Allegheny General Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Jannat RU; Department of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
  • Reddy YK; Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
  • Hadi Y; Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
  • Gayam S; Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 38(6): 905-909, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2278927
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

AIM:

Sars-CoV-19 pandemic necessitated a transition to telemedicine for many healthcare encounters. The environmental impact of this transition in gastroenterology (GI) combined with user experience has not been studied.

METHODS:

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent telemedicine visits (telephone and video) at a GI clinic at West Virginia University. Distance of patients' residence from clinic × 2 was calculated, and Environmental Protection Agency calculators utilized to calculate greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that were avoided from tele-visits. Patients were reached by telephone and were asked questions to fill in a validated Telehealth Usability Questionnaire with Likert scales (1-7). Variables were also collected via chart review.

RESULTS:

A total of 81 video and 89 telephone visits were conducted for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) between March 2020 and March 2021. A total of 111 patients were enrolled, with a response rate of 65.29%. Mean age was lower in the video visit cohort compared with the telephone visit cohort (43.45 ± 14.32 years vs 52.34 ± 17.46 years). Most patients had medications prescribed during the visit (79.3%), and a majority had laboratory testing orders placed (57.7%). We calculated a total distance of 8732 miles that the patients would have traveled if they were to present for in-person visits (including return trips). A total of 393.3 gallons of gasoline would have been required to transport these patients to and from the healthcare facility to their residence. A total of 3.5 metric tons of GHG's were saved by avoiding 393.3 gallons of gasoline for travel. In relatable terms, this is equivalent to burning more than 3500 pounds of coal. This averages to 31.5-kg GHG emissions and 3.54 gallons of gasoline saved per patient.

CONCLUSION:

Telemedicine for GERD resulted in significant environmental savings and was rated highly for access, satisfaction, and usability by patients. Telemedicine for GERD can be an excellent alternative to in-person visits.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Gastroesophageal Reflux / Telemedicine Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Adult / Humans / Middle aged Language: English Journal: J Gastroenterol Hepatol Journal subject: Gastroenterology Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jgh.16148

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Gastroesophageal Reflux / Telemedicine Type of study: Cohort study / Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Adult / Humans / Middle aged Language: English Journal: J Gastroenterol Hepatol Journal subject: Gastroenterology Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Jgh.16148