Outcome of Tunneled Cuffed Catheter as Hemodialysis Access;a Single Centre Experience in a Tertiary Care Centre in Eastern India

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Although AVFs are preferred vascular access for hemodialysis, tunneled cuffed catheters(TCC) are increasingly being used as dialysis access in certain clinical situations such as in AVF failure or lack of suitable vessels for AVF creation or bridge to living donor transplant. Aim and objective of this study was to study the characteristics of the population having benefited from tunneled cuffed catheters, to identify the different indications as well as the complications secondary to tunneled cuffed catheters in hemodialysis patients and to determine the catheter and patient survival rate and the factors associated with complications and survival. Method(s) This was an retrospective Observational study done after institutional ethics committee approval. All data was captured using standard proforma. The data was tabulated using MS excel and all results projected in form of bar graphs, pie charts, histograms or tables. Kaplan- meier analysis was used for survival. All patients included in the study consented for the procedure as well as collection of data. 527 TCC placement were done in 498 patients by nephrologists without fluoroscopy in a percutaneous fashion between jan 2021 to march 2022. Minimum follow up was 12 months. 37 patients lost to follow up. Result(s) 316 (68.5%) were males and mean age was 48.3+/-12.6 years. Staggered tip MAHURKAR MaxidTM Covidien, was used in every patient. Most common native kidney disease was cresentic GN 176(38.1%). Most common Site of TCC was right internal jugular 88.9%(441/496), followed by left internal jugular 10.48%(52/496), femoral TCC done in 0.6%. Mean blood flow achieved was 311+/- 32ml/min. Most common indication of TCC placement was starting of HD after 1/2 temporary access- 162(32.66%), followed by awaiting Maturation of autogenous AVF 66 (13.3%) and awaiting living-related transplantation 54(10.88%). Total catheter related infective episodes (CRBSI) were 229 (1.07 episodes/1000catheter days),Exit site infection was in 57 cases (0.26 /1000 catheter days), Tunnel infection was in 51(0.19/1000 catheter days), Infective endocarditis was seen in 3 cases. Catheter loss due to CRBSI was 23 (12.16%). Most common organism was Enterococci (29.7%), followed by s.aureus (24.32%). Most common immediate complication was tunnel bleeding (5.9% ), followed by improper tip position 4.68%. Late complications due to TCC thrombosis/ fibrin sheath was 74(15.07%). Recanalisation with urokinase was successful in 36.84%. Central venous stenosis was in 26 cases. successful recanalisation after central venoplasty was 16/19 (84.21%). Mean catheter survival was 201.9 +/- 114.9 days (3day to 12 months). Catheter survival at the end of 3 months was 75.76%, at 6 months 63.4%, at 12months 32.17%. Patient survival at 6 months was 86.7%, at 12 months- 77.5%. Most common cause of death was unrelated to TCC - cardiovascular cause (77.6%). Direct TCC related death was in 5 cases. Most common cause of catheter drop out was patient death (33.03%), followed by maturation of AVF (22.82%), catheter thrombosis/fibrin sheath (22.2%). [Formula presented] Conclusion(s) Though AVF is the best access, for late unplanned HD initiation in many CKD patients, TCC insertion becomes next best option. In access crisis patients, TCC may remain one feasible option for bridge to available live donor transplant. With strict asepsis protocol and technical aptitude TCC placement is safe with few side effects. No conflict of interestCopyright © 2023