Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) patients are more likely to digitally explore clinical trial options and prior to receiving treatment for advanced disease compared to non-TNBC patients

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), an aggressive form of breast cancer (BC) that is associated with poor prognosis, accounts for 10-15% of all BCs. Chemotherapy remains the standard of care (SOC) for advanced disease, with limited clinical benefit. Oncology clinical trials (CTs) are globally recommended and encouraged as the preferred treatment (tx) option for any cancer patient (pt). 'TrialJectory' (TJ) is an artificial intelligence (AI)-based technology that matches pts to oncology CTs. Here, we identified distinct characteristics of TNBC pts who signed up to the TJ platform compared to non-TNBC pts. Method(s) Using AI and an unsupervised natural language processing approach, the TJ platform clinically matches pts to CTs. Matching is achieved by pt response to an online dynamic questionnaire (www.trialjectory.com) that collects detailed clinical data including clinico-pathologic characteristics, tx history, general health, and comorbidities. Those are compared to the eligibility criteria of available CTs to yield a high-quality actionable matched-trial list. Result(s) Between 1/2020 and 12/2021, out of 9796 BC pts that signed up, 2688 were TNBC pts (27%). There was no significant difference in age at sign-up between TNBC and non-TNBC patients (median age of 57 years vs 58 years, respectively). Consistently with Non-hispanic black (NHB) race prevalence in the different molecular subtypes in the general US population, NHB race had higher signup rate in TNBC compared to non-TNBC (9.95% vs 5.76%, respectively). TNBC pts signed up at a later disease stage compared to non-TNBC pts (19% of TNBC reported having a stage 1 disease compared to 27% of non-TNBC pts, p< 0.001).A significantly higher percentage of pts with advanced/metastatic TNBC signed up to the TJ platform before starting tx compared to non-TNBC patients (34% vs 22%, respectively, p< 0.001). Furthermore, there was a significant difference in the willingness to travel any distance within the US for a matched clinical trial between TNBC and non-TNBC pts (39% vs 34%, respectively, p< 0.001). Conclusion(s) In this study, we found significant differences in the characteristics of TNBC vs non-TNBC pts that have signed up to the TJ platform. There was an up to 2-fold enrichment of TNBC on the TJ platform pts compared to their frequency in the general population. While previous studies do not show a difference in stage distribution between different subtypes, TNBC patients initiated their search for CTs at a higher stage. In addition, advanced TNBC patients started their search earlier in their journey, before starting chemotherapy. This may reflect the lack of effective SOC and possibly, the motivation to avoid the use of chemotherapy. This is also supported by the willingness of TNBC patients to travel farther in order to identify and enroll in a CT compared to non-TNBC pts. Importantly, the motivation of TNBC pts to travel any distance has not been reduced despite the COVID-19 pandemic, reflecting a strong drive of this pt population to enroll in CTs. It also demonstrates that with the right access, diverse patient populations are willing to participate in clinical trials. In sum, TNBC pts are more likely to explore CT options, in the advanced stage setting, earlier in their journey. This study demonstrates the power of TJ platform for clinico-pathologic characterization and diverse pt groups, including their drivers and behavioral choices during their battle with cancer.