Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Telemedicine in Urology: Where Have We Been and Where Are We Heading?
Symeonidis, Evangelos N; Veneziano, Domenico; Borgmann, Hendrik; Zapala, Lukasz; Zachariou, Athanasios; Brenneis, Horst; Haensel, Stefan M; Haas, Helmut; Dimitriadis, Fotios.
  • Symeonidis EN; Department of Urology I, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece.
  • Veneziano D; Smith Institute of Urology, Northwell Health, New York, NY, USA.
  • Borgmann H; Department of Urology, University Hospital Medical School Brandenburg, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany.
  • Zapala L; Department of General, Oncological and Functional Urology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
  • Zachariou A; Department of Urology, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece.
  • Brenneis H; Department of Urology, Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany.
  • Haensel SM; Department of Urology, Franciscus Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Haas H; ESUO, Heppenheim, Germany.
  • Dimitriadis F; Department of Urology I, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of Medicine, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Eur Urol Open Sci ; 50: 106-112, 2023 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2283198
ABSTRACT
Context Humanity is facing significant challenges, and in 2019, a new coronavirus caused an unprecedented global disease outbreak. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic vastly impacted health care delivery, generating devastating economic, social, and public health disruption. Although previously underutilized, it was not until recently that telemedicine emerged and amassed tremendous popularity.

Objective:

To examine and assess telemedicine's past, present, and future roles in urology. Evidence acquisition We queried relevant literature investigating the role of telemedicine in urology using the electronic PubMed database and mainly focused on English-language studies of any design. Evidence

synthesis:

Growing attention has been paid to the widespread adoption of novel telehealth technologies for managing various diseases. Meanwhile, solid evidence supports the meaningful use of telemedicine for most urological diagnoses. Existing literature delineates telemedicine as a viable, safe, and convenient alternative to in-person clinical visits.

Conclusions:

The present article overviews the evolution of telemedicine in urology, and discusses its application in outpatient and physician's office settings. In addition, it highlights the technical, legal, ethical, and financial aspects of telemedicine while providing valuable insights and practical considerations for the future of telehealth in urology. Patient

summary:

Urologists must adopt telemedicine carefully in daily practice, always adhering to predefined regulatory frameworks.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic study / Reviews Language: English Journal: Eur Urol Open Sci Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.euros.2023.02.005

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Prognostic study / Reviews Language: English Journal: Eur Urol Open Sci Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: J.euros.2023.02.005