Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Did lockdown influence bystanders' willingness to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation? A worldwide registry-based perspective.
Tjelmeland, Ingvild B M; Wnent, Jan; Masterson, Siobhan; Kramer-Johansen, Jo; Ong, Marcus Eng Hock; Smith, Karen; Skogvoll, Eirik; Lefering, Rolf; Lim, Shir Lynn; Liu, Nan; Dicker, Bridget; Swain, Andrew; Ball, Stephen; Gräsner, Jan-Thorsten.
  • Tjelmeland IBM; Division of Prehospital Services, Oslo University Hospital, Norway; Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway; University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Institute for Emergency Medicine, Kiel, Germany. Electronic address: ingvild@nakos.no.
  • Wnent J; University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Institute for Emergency Medicine, Kiel, Germany; University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Kiel, Germany; University of Namibia, School of Medicine, Windhoek, Namibia.
  • Masterson S; Clinical Directorate, National Ambulance Service, Health Service Executive, Ireland.
  • Kramer-Johansen J; Division of Prehospital Services, Oslo University Hospital, Norway; Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway; University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Institute for Emergency Medicine, Kiel, Germany.
  • Ong MEH; Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; Department of Emergency Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
  • Smith K; Centre for Research and Evaluation, Ambulance Victoria, Victoria, Australia; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia.
  • Skogvoll E; Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway; Clinic of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, St.Olav University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
  • Lefering R; Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), University Witten/Herdecke, Faculty of Health, Cologne, Germany.
  • Lim SL; Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore; Department of Cardiology, National University Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore; Department of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore.
  • Liu N; Health Services and Systems Research, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
  • Dicker B; Paramedicine Department, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
  • Swain A; Paramedicine Department, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand; Wellington Free Ambulance, New Zealand.
  • Ball S; Prehospital, Resuscitation and Emergency Care Research Unit (PRECRU), School of Nursing, Curtin University, Australia; St John Ambulance Western Australia, Belmont, Australia.
  • Gräsner JT; University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Institute for Emergency Medicine, Kiel, Germany; University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Kiel, Germany.
Resuscitation ; 186: 109764, 2023 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2284188
ABSTRACT

AIM:

Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) significantly increases the survival rate after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Using population-based registries, we investigated the impact of lockdown due to Covid-19 on the provision of bystander CPR, taking background changes over time into consideration.

METHODS:

Using a registry network, we invited all registries capable of delivering data from 1. January 2017 to 31. December 2020 to participate in this study. We used negative binominal regression for the analysis of the overall results. We also calculated the rates for bystander CPR. For every participating registry, we analysed the incidence per 100000 inhabitants of bystander CPR and EMS-treated patients using Poisson regression, including time trends.

RESULTS:

Twenty-six established OHCA registries reported 742 923 cardiac arrest patients over a four-year period covering 1.3 billion person-years. We found large variations in the reported incidence between and within continents. There was an increase in the incidence of bystander CPR of almost 5% per year. The lockdown in March/April 2020 did not impact this trend. The increase in the rate of bystander CPR was also seen when analysing data on a continental level. We found large variations in incidence of bystander CPR before and after lockdown when analysing data on a registry level.

CONCLUSION:

There was a steady increase in bystander CPR from 2017 to 2020, not associated with an increase in the number of ambulance-treated cardiac arrest patients. We did not find an association between lockdown and bystanders' willingness to start CPR before ambulance arrival, but we found inconsistent patterns of changes between registries.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation / Emergency Medical Services / Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Resuscitation Year: 2023 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation / Emergency Medical Services / Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Resuscitation Year: 2023 Document Type: Article