Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Navigating biosafety concerns within COVID-19 do-it-yourself (DIY) science: an ethnographic and interview study.
Wexler, Anna; Choi, Rebekah; Pearlman, Alex; Rasmussen, Lisa M.
  • Wexler A; 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania.
  • Choi R; 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania.
  • Pearlman A; 423 Guardian Drive, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA Department of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, University of Pennsylvania.
  • Rasmussen LM; Charlotte, USA Department of Philosophy, University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
Biosocieties ; : 1-22, 2023 Mar 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2286602
ABSTRACT
Non-establishment or do-it-yourself (DIY) science involves individuals who may not have formal training conducting experiments outside of institutional settings. While prior scholarship has examined the motivations and values of those involved in the subset of DIY science known as "DIY biology," little research has addressed how these individuals navigate ethical issues in practice. The present study therefore aimed to understand how DIY biologists identify, approach, and resolve one particular ethical issue-biosafety-in their work. We conducted a digital ethnography of Just One Giant Lab (JOGL), the primary hub for DIY biology during the COVID-19 pandemic, and subsequently conducted interviews with individuals involved with JOGL. We found that JOGL was the first global DIY biology initiative to create a Biosafety Advisory Board and develop formal biosafety guidelines that applied to different groups in multiple locations. There was disagreement, however, regarding whether the Board should have an advisory role or provide mandatory oversight. We found that JOGL practiced ethical gatekeeping of projects that fell outside the limits defined by the Board. Our findings show that the DIY biology community recognized biosafety issues and tried to build infrastructure to facilitate the safe conduct of research. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1057/s41292-023-00301-2.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Qualitative research Language: English Journal: Biosocieties Year: 2023 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Qualitative research Language: English Journal: Biosocieties Year: 2023 Document Type: Article