Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The role of partners, parents and friends in shaping young women's reproductive choices in Peri-urban Nairobi: a qualitative study.
Zinke-Allmang, Anja; Bhatia, Amiya; Gorur, Krittika; Hassan, Rahma; Shipow, Amy; Ogolla, Concilia; Keizer, Kees; Cislaghi, Beniamino.
  • Zinke-Allmang A; Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK. anja.zinke@lshtm.ac.uk.
  • Bhatia A; Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
  • Gorur K; Busara Center for Behavioral Economics, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Hassan R; University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Shipow A; Busara Center for Behavioral Economics, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Ogolla C; Busara Center for Behavioral Economics, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • Keizer K; University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands.
  • Cislaghi B; Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Reprod Health ; 20(1): 41, 2023 Mar 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2289125
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Contraceptive use among young women in Nairobi remains low despite high general knowledge of family planning (FP) methods. This paper draws on social norms theory to explore the role of key influencers (partners, parents and friends) in women's FP use and how women anticipate normative reactions or sanctions.

METHODS:

A qualitative study with 16 women, 10 men and 14 key influencers across 7 peri-urban wards in Nairobi, Kenya. Interviews were conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 by phone. A thematic analysis was conducted.

RESULTS:

Women identified parents, specifically mothers, aunts, partners, friends and healthcare workers as key influencers on FP. Their interactions with these key influencers varied based on trust, the information they needed about FP, and whether they perceived a key influencer to perpetuate or challenge existing social norms on FP. Mothers were perceived to understand the social risks of using FP and thus could advise on discreet FP use, and aunts were trusted and approachable sources to impartially describe the benefits and drawbacks of FP. Although women identified partners as key FP decision makers, they were cognisant of possible power imbalances affecting a final FP choice.

CONCLUSIONS:

FP interventions should consider the normative influence key actors have on women's FP choices. Opportunities to design and deliver network-level interventions which seek to engage with social norms surrounding FP in order to challenge misconceptions and misinformation among key influencers should be explored. Intervention design should consider dynamics of secrecy, trust and emotional closeness that mediate discussions of FP to address changing norms. Further training to change norms held by healthcare providers about why women, in particular unmarried young women, access FP should be provided to reduce barriers for FP access.
Women's decisions to use family planning (FP) are influenced by social norms, the unwritten rules of appropriate actions within social networks, and are shaped by advice and information received from key influencers­important individuals who shape what is acceptable within social networks. The aim of this study was to understand how key influencers uphold and transmit information and norms about FP, and explore who women consult as they make FP decisions and why they consult these key influencers.We interviewed 16 women, 10 partners and 14 key influencers in peri-urban Nairobi, Kenya.We found that key influencers for decisions about FP included mothers, aunts, partners, friends and healthcare providers. In making a decision about FP use, women consulted key influencers based on who they deemed trustworthy to keep their FP use secret and described less trust to speak with men about FP in their social networks. Mothers understood the social risks of using FP and so could advise on its discreet use, and aunts were approachable sources of impartial information about FP. Although women identified partners as key decision makers, they were aware that power imbalances might affect final FP choices.Our findings underscore the importance of FP interventions working with women's social networks and to address social norms influencing women's decisions in using FP. Interventions to change FP norms should consider dynamics of secrecy, trust and emotional closeness that affect FP discussions among women's networks.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Friends / COVID-19 Type of study: Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: Africa Language: English Journal: Reprod Health Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12978-023-01581-4

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Friends / COVID-19 Type of study: Prognostic study / Qualitative research Limits: Female / Humans / Male Country/Region as subject: Africa Language: English Journal: Reprod Health Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12978-023-01581-4