The CRISIS Approach When Autonomy and Beneficence Are in Conflict (CS358)

ABSTRACT

Outcomes: 1. Utilizing CRISIS approach, participants can employ a unique strategy to holistically support patients with poor coping in an acute life-threatening situation. 2. Utilizing the CRISIS approach, participants will apply an ethical tool to mitigate the incongruence that sometimes happens between two ethical principles-autonomy versus beneficence. Autonomy is not always in harmony with beneficence. We present a patient with decisional capacity hospitalized with acute reversible neuromuscular paralysis who refused treatment despite expected recovery. Her decision created moral distress for the clinicians. An improvised palliative strategy resolved the above dilemma. Case presentation 68-year-old female admitted with new-onset unsteady gait, diplopia, and speech impairment on waking up. She was healthy until 3 weeks before admission, when she developed upper extremity numbness progressing to both legs after a COVID-19 infection. She had bulbar and axial muscle weakness and right oculomotor nerve palsy with ptosis. Positive ice pack and pyridostigmine test indicated myasthenia gravis (MG). During hospitalization, she required mechanical ventilation secondary to acute respiratory failure from progressive paralysis. Serum-negative MG diagnosed, given the response to IVIG and pyridostigmine. The patient, amid acute crisis, refused therapies and wanted to transition to DNR-comfort care despite understanding the reversibility of her illness. Her family members supported comfort care option. Neurology was conflicted with the patient's choice because MG was treatable. Palliative care, ethics, and neuropsychology consulted to establish decision-making capacity, goals-of-care, and holistic support. Intervention(s) Palliative team utilized the CRISIS approach to address the impasse between the patient and the clinicians 1. Continue care, collaborate with the teams 2. Respond empathetically 3. Integrate patient's autonomy 4. Support holistically 5. Improvise a care plan 6. Sustain quality of life We validated patient's autonomy. We recommended allowing time for the patient/family to process her illness. We continued holistic support and symptom management and created an improvised multidisciplinary plan to help her cope with the acute illness. The above approach enabled her to opt for therapies instead of comfort care only, and she gradually recovered. Respecting patients' autonomy and incorporating beneficence via our intervention led to positive outcomes. The CRISIS approach could help other clinicians in the situation when conflict arises between autonomy and beneficence.Copyright © 2023