Comparison of the approaches to evaluation the virus-neutralizing activity of sera from COVID-19 recovered individuals

ABSTRACT

Background: Serum virus-neutralization (VNT)capacity is an important parameter of immunological response in COVID-19 recovered individuals and it can also be used to predict the effectiveness of therapy with COVID-19 convalescent plasma. The most commonly used tests to assess virus-neutralization are those that use native SARS-CoV- 2 (cVNT), SARS-CoV- 2 spike pseudotyped lentivirus-like particles (pVNT), and also inhibition of recombinant RBD binding to ACE2 receptor in vitro (surrogate VNT, sVNT). The aim of this study was to determine the interchangeability of different approaches in the evaluation of the virus-neutralization activity of convalescent serum samples. Method(s) Serum samples (n = 111) were collected 10-36 days after recovery between May and September 2020. The SARS-CoV- 2 strain PMVL-12/ 2020 was used in cVNT at 100 doses of TCID50. In pVNT SARS-CoV- 2 pseudotyped HIV-1 based virus-like particles with GFP reporter gene were used. sVNT was performed with a kit from Xema Co., Russia. Result(s) A very strong correlation was observed between cVNT and pVNT results (Spearman's r = 0.841). The correlation of cVNT and pVNT with the sVNT was only moderate (r = 0.674 and 0.696, respectively). This is consistent with the fact that sVNT detects only RBD blocking antibodies, which are the main but not the only inhibitors of viral infection. Serum samples were also tested for RBD-specific IgG, IgM, IgA antibodies by ELISA. A good correlation was found between the cVNT, pVNT, sVNT results and the RBD-specific IgG (r = 0.669, 0.620, and 0.643, respectively), that confirms a crucial role of specific IgG antibodies in virus-neutralization. RBD-specific IgA showed a moderate correlation with the neutralization capacity of sera from recovered individuals (r = 0.563, 0.583, 0.544). Correlation of approximately the same level was observed between cVNT, pVNT, and RBD-specific IgM (r = 0.663, 0.615), but not sVNT and RBD-specific IgM (r = 0.395). Conclusion(s) This study demonstrated the possibility of using the safe and relatively simple pseudotyped virus-neutralization test instead of cVNT to assess the sera virus-neutralizing capacity. sVNT may be efficiently used in screening studies.