Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Esophagocolonic OrVil Anastomosis After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.
Cao, Cheng; Liu, Feng; Yu, Shouqiang; Chai, Huiping.
  • Cao C; Department of Thoracic Surgery, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
  • Liu F; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Lishui District People's Hospital, Lishui Branch of Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
  • Yu S; Department of Thoracic Surgery, Lishui District People's Hospital, Lishui Branch of Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
  • Chai H; Department of Thoracic Surgery, the Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ; 2022 Sep 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2292886
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

The classical colon substitution procedure is open surgery. Still, technological developments could allow a minimally invasive procedure that might improve patient outcomes. To present the efficacy and safety of esophagocolonic OrVil anastomosis after minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Methods:

This retrospective study included 10 patients with esophageal cancer treated with OrVil anastomosis (OA) between August 2017 and May 2021 at Department of Thoracic Surgery, Nanjing Lishui People's Hospital, Zhongda Hospital Lishui Branch, Southeast University, Nanjing, China and the Fourth Associated Hospital of Anhui Medical University. The patient's characteristic information and related perioperative indexes were collected from the hospital's electronic medical record system and the patients were followed up.

Results:

The mean operative time and median intraoperative blood loss were 530 ± 88 minutes and 200 (range 100-300) mL, respectively. A median of 26 (range 13-30) lymph nodes was dissected per patient. The median total duration of hospitalization and postoperative hospitalization was 32 (range 24-64) and 15 (range 12-42) days, respectively. Seven (70%) patients had postoperative pulmonary infections. Two (20%) patients had postoperative respiratory failure. No esophagocolonic anastomotic leakage was observed in all cases. One patient was complicated with postoperative colonicoduodenal anastomotic leakage after the operation and was cured. However, 1 (10%) of the remaining 9 patients died from colonicolonic anastomotic leakage during hospitalization. The living 9 cases were followed up, and the median overall survival time was 36 months.

Conclusion:

Colonic interposition for esophageal cancer is effective and safe using the minimally invasive OA technique.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Lap.2022.0172

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study Language: English Year: 2022 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Lap.2022.0172