Your browser doesn't support javascript.
The effect of choosing optimizer algorithms to improve computer vision tasks: a comparative study.
Hassan, Esraa; Shams, Mahmoud Y; Hikal, Noha A; Elmougy, Samir.
  • Hassan E; Faculty of Artificial Intelligence, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh, 33516 Egypt.
  • Shams MY; Faculty of Artificial Intelligence, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafrelsheikh, 33516 Egypt.
  • Hikal NA; Department of Information Technology, Faculty of Computers and Information, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516 Egypt.
  • Elmougy S; Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Computers and Information, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516 Egypt.
Multimed Tools Appl ; : 1-43, 2022 Sep 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2296249
ABSTRACT
Optimization algorithms are used to improve model accuracy. The optimization process undergoes multiple cycles until convergence. A variety of optimization strategies have been developed to overcome the obstacles involved in the learning process. Some of these strategies have been considered in this study to learn more about their complexities. It is crucial to analyse and summarise optimization techniques methodically from a machine learning standpoint since this can provide direction for future work in both machine learning and optimization. The approaches under consideration include the Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), Stochastic Optimization Descent with Momentum, Rung Kutta, Adaptive Learning Rate, Root Mean Square Propagation, Adaptive Moment Estimation, Deep Ensembles, Feedback Alignment, Direct Feedback Alignment, Adfactor, AMSGrad, and Gravity. prove the ability of each optimizer applied to machine learning models. Firstly, tests on a skin cancer using the ISIC standard dataset for skin cancer detection were applied using three common optimizers (Adaptive Moment, SGD, and Root Mean Square Propagation) to explore the effect of the algorithms on the skin images. The optimal training results from the analysis indicate that the performance values are enhanced using the Adam optimizer, which achieved 97.30% accuracy. The second dataset is COVIDx CT images, and the results achieved are 99.07% accuracy based on the Adam optimizer. The result indicated that the utilisation of optimizers such as SGD and Adam improved the accuracy in training, testing, and validation stages.
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Language: English Journal: Multimed Tools Appl Year: 2022 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Language: English Journal: Multimed Tools Appl Year: 2022 Document Type: Article