Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Informing the design of a whole of life immunisation register for Australia.
Kpozehouen, Elizabeth B; Heywood, Anita E; Menzies, Robert; Seale, Holly; Brotherton, Julia; Raina Macintyre, C.
  • Kpozehouen EB; Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia. Electronic address: e.kpozehouen@unsw.edu.au.
  • Heywood AE; School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Australia.
  • Menzies R; School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Australia.
  • Seale H; School of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Australia.
  • Brotherton J; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Australia; Formerly Australian Centre for the Prevention of Cervical Cancer, East Melbourne, Australia.
  • Raina Macintyre C; Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Vaccine ; 41(19): 3011-3018, 2023 05 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2298177
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

In 2016, Australia launched a whole life immunisation register, the Australian Immunisation Register (AIR), building on a universal childhood register established in 1997. Immunisation Information Systems are well established in Europe, the US and elsewhere. However, a national system covering immunisation across the lifespan, with complete capture of the population and satisfactory data quality, is rare.

METHODS:

A national workshop was convened in 2016 with key stakeholders from the government, new and existing vaccine users, and vaccine providers to review the ideal features of the AIR to ensure optimal effectiveness. This workshop focused on the functionality needed to identify population groups newly included in the register and support the achievement of high immunisation coverage in these groups eligible for National Immunisation Program vaccines.

RESULTS:

Key recommendations included the need for bidirectional data flow between the AIR and providers; systematic approaches to the capture and recording of accurate and complete data to ascertain important denominators for subpopulations, includingAboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status, medical risk factors, occupation, ethnicity, country of birth, and vaccines given during pregnancy; linkage with other government datasets including notifiable diseases; the capture of adverse events following immunisation; ease of access by patients, providers; and by researchers.

CONCLUSIONS:

Some recommendations from the workshop have informed the development and future utility of the AIR. Some recommendations from the workshop have been integrated into the current iteration of the AIR, which is more important than ever given the roll-out of COVID-19 vaccines. The accuracy and validity of data have subsequently improved through data entry controls, data integrity checks and reporting requirements. Access to AIR data for research remains protracted and costly, limitingresearch potential.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Vaccines / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Topics: Vaccines Limits: Child / Humans Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: English Journal: Vaccine Year: 2023 Document Type: Article

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Vaccines / COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Observational study / Prognostic study / Randomized controlled trials / Systematic review/Meta Analysis Topics: Vaccines Limits: Child / Humans Country/Region as subject: Oceania Language: English Journal: Vaccine Year: 2023 Document Type: Article