Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Investigating public behavior with artificial intelligence-assisted detection of face mask wearing during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Seresirikachorn, Kasem; Ruamviboonsuk, Paisan; Soonthornworasiri, Ngamphol; Singhanetr, Panisa; Prakayaphun, Titipakorn; Kaothanthong, Natsuda; Somwangthanaroj, Surapoom; Theeramunkong, Thanaruk.
  • Seresirikachorn K; Sirindhorn International Institute of Technology, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand.
  • Ruamviboonsuk P; Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Rajavithi Hospital, Rangsit University, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Soonthornworasiri N; Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Department of Tropical Hygiene, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Singhanetr P; Department of Ophthalmology, Mettapracharak Hospital, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
  • Prakayaphun T; Department of Constructional Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Chubu University, Kasugai, Japan.
  • Kaothanthong N; Sirindhorn International Institute of Technology, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand.
  • Somwangthanaroj S; Sirindhorn International Institute of Technology, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand.
  • Theeramunkong T; Sirindhorn International Institute of Technology, Thammasat University, Pathumthani, Thailand.
PLoS One ; 18(4): e0281841, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2303408
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Face masks are low-cost, but effective in preventing transmission of COVID-19. To visualize public's practice of protection during the outbreak, we reported the rate of face mask wearing using artificial intelligence-assisted face mask detector, AiMASK.

METHODS:

After validation, AiMASK collected data from 32 districts in Bangkok. We analyzed the association between factors affecting the unprotected group (incorrect or non-mask wearing) using univariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS:

AiMASK was validated before data collection with accuracy of 97.83% and 91% during internal and external validation, respectively. AiMASK detected a total of 1,124,524 people. The unprotected group consisted of 2.06% of incorrect mask-wearing group and 1.96% of non-mask wearing group. Moderate negative correlation was found between the number of COVID-19 patients and the proportion of unprotected people (r = -0.507, p<0.001). People were 1.15 times more likely to be unprotected during the holidays and in the evening, than on working days and in the morning (OR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.13-1.17, p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

AiMASK was as effective as human graders in detecting face mask wearing. The prevailing number of COVID-19 infections affected people's mask-wearing behavior. Higher tendencies towards no protection were found in the evenings, during holidays, and in city centers.
Subject(s)

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0281841

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Prognostic study Limits: Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: PLoS One Journal subject: Science / Medicine Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: Journal.pone.0281841