Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Use of anti-viral therapies in hospitalised COVID-19 patients in the United Arab Emirates: a cost-effectiveness and health-care resource use analysis.
Subhi, Ahmad; Shamy, Amin Mohamed El; Hussein, Saeed Abdullah Mohammed; Jarrett, James; Kozma, Sam; Harfouche, Camille; Al Dallal, Sara.
  • Subhi A; Al-Qassimi Hospital Sharjah, Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
  • Shamy AME; Ministry of Health and Prevention, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
  • Hussein SAM; Global Medical Solution, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
  • Jarrett J; Gilead Sciences Inc, London, UK. james.jarrett@gilead.com.
  • Kozma S; Gilead Sciences Inc, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
  • Harfouche C; Gilead Sciences Inc, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
  • Al Dallal S; Emirates Health Economics Society, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 23(1): 383, 2023 Apr 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2304287
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

This study attempts to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the antiviral remdesivir, as recommended in the 2021 COVID treatment guidelines for the United Arab Emirates, compared to standard of care (SOC), but also favipiravir (FAVI), which was also recommended for the treatment of hospitalized COVID patients.

METHODS:

A cost-effectiveness model was built using published efficacy data for RDV, FAVI and SOC as well as local epidemiology data. The outcomes measured included hospital bed days averted, mortality, costs and cost per outcome over one year. One-way, probabilistic and scenario analyses were undertaken to reflect uncertainty in the estimates.

RESULTS:

When modelled over one year, the results indicated that treatment of adults in need of supplemental oxygen with RDV + SOC could result in 11,338 fewer general ward bed days, 7,003 fewer ICU days and 5,451 fewer ICU + MIV bed days compared to SOC alone and similar results when compared with FAVI + SOC. The model results also showed that there were 374 fewer deaths associated with the use of RDV + SOC compared to SOC alone. The model also estimates substantial potential cost-savings associated with RDV + SOC treatment compared with SOC alone (USD 3,454 per patient). The results of the one-way sensitivity analysis showed that the model was sensitive to estimates of length of stay and the cost of hospitalization. Despite this, the model predicted cost-savings in all scenarios versus all comparators.

CONCLUSIONS:

The model estimated that using RDV + SOC could result in substantial reductions in HCRU and cost savings regardless of the comparator. However, it should be noted that reliable clinical information on FAVI was limited therefore it is challenging to interpret these results. All the potential benefits modelled here for RDV + SOC can have implications not only for the health of the UAE population but for improving hospital capacity to deal with other conditions.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Limits: Adult / Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Journal subject: Health Services Research Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12913-023-09376-w

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: COVID-19 Type of study: Experimental Studies / Prognostic study Limits: Adult / Humans Country/Region as subject: Asia Language: English Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Journal subject: Health Services Research Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S12913-023-09376-w