Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Regulatory, health technology assessment and company interactions: the current landscape and future ecosystem for drug development, review and reimbursement.
Wang, Ting; McAuslane, Neil; Goettsch, Wim G; Leufkens, Hubert G M; De Bruin, Marie L.
  • Wang T; Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science (CIRS), London, UK.
  • McAuslane N; Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Goettsch WG; Centre for Innovation in Regulatory Science (CIRS), London, UK.
  • Leufkens HGM; Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • De Bruin ML; National Health Care Institute, Diemen, The Netherlands.
Int J Technol Assess Health Care ; 39(1): e20, 2023 Apr 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2305512
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Multi-stakeholder interactions have evolved at product and policy levels. There is a need to assess the current and future landscape of interactions between companies, and regulatory and HTA agencies to address challenges and identify areas for improvement.

OBJECTIVES:

The aims of this study were to review the current interactions within and across regulatory and HTA agencies, and companies' experiences in engaging in these activities; to assess the added value of interactions as well as limitations; to explore the future ecosystem for stakeholder interactions.

METHOD:

Three separate questionnaires were developed for companies, regulators and HTA agencies, respectively, to assess their experiences and perceptions. The responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics and discussed at a multi-stakeholder workshop. Key outcomes from the surveys and workshop discussion were reported.

RESULTS:

All seven regulators and seven HTA agencies in the survey indicated that they had stakeholder interactions. More formal collaboration occurred with regulators compared with HTA agencies. All nine companies have taken early advice but indicated the need for future prioritization. Success indicators can be built at the product and therapy levels, with the added value of faster patient access. Four principles were proposed for the future ecosystem separate remit and functions between regulators and HTA; align processes; converge evidence requirements where possible; increase transparency.

CONCLUSIONS:

This research brought together regulators, HTA agencies, companies to examine how they interact with one another. We propose measures of value and make recommendations on future evolution to enable better evidence generation and improve regulatory and HTA decision-making.
Subject(s)
Keywords

Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Technology Assessment, Biomedical / Ecosystem Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Int J Technol Assess Health Care Journal subject: Health Services Research Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S0266462323000144

Similar

MEDLINE

...
LILACS

LIS


Full text: Available Collection: International databases Database: MEDLINE Main subject: Technology Assessment, Biomedical / Ecosystem Type of study: Observational study / Prognostic study / Qualitative research / Randomized controlled trials / Reviews Limits: Humans Language: English Journal: Int J Technol Assess Health Care Journal subject: Health Services Research Year: 2023 Document Type: Article Affiliation country: S0266462323000144