Telerehabilitation in the 'real-world': Implementation of remotely delivered pulmonary rehabilitation

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is an effective treatment for people with chronic respiratory disease but is delivered to <5% of eligible individuals. Home-based telerehabilitation achieves similar clinical outcomes to centre-based PR in clinical trials. We aimed to evaluate the clinical implementation of telerehabilitation. Method(s) Suitable individuals with respiratory disease referred for PR at Alfred Health have been offered the option of an 8-week home-based telerehabilitation program (one home visit followed by twice-weekly exercise training sessions, with real time supervision, for 8-weeks). Equipment was provided to patients, as necessary. Standard PR assessments were conducted pre and post program. Program completion was defined as undertaking >=70% of prescribed sessions. Real-world implementation was evaluated against the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework. Result(s) Reach Across 2-years (Sept 2020-22), 269 people were referred with 55 (21%) undertaking telerehabilitation (25 female, mean (SD) age 61 (11) years, 6-min walk distance (6MWD) 430 (120) metres, Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire Dyspnoea (CRQD) domain 16 (6)). Participant diagnoses included COPD (n = 11), ILD (n = 15), bronchiectasis (n = 5), asthma (n = 2), post COVID-19 (n = 9), and pulmonary hypertension (n = 4). Forty participants (73%) completed >=70% of prescribed sessions. Effectiveness Significant and clinically meaningful improvements were demonstrated (CRQD MD 4 (95% CI 1, 6);6MWD MD 24 m (95% CI 8, 41)). Adoption Training to deliver telerehabilitation and perform home visits was completed by PR clinicians (n = 7 and n = 4 respectively). Implementation All participants independently supplied Wi-Fi, and 40% used their own exercise equipment or internet-enabled device. Most participants had an in-person home visit (n = 45), and undertook cycle-based training (n = 46). Fifteen participants required additional support for iPad or videoconferencing navigation. There were no serious adverse advents. Maintenance will be evaluated following this pilot period. Conclusion(s) 'Real-world' telerehabilitation achieves clinically meaningful outcomes for patients and provided access to an effective model of PR particularly when centre-based programs were unavailable due to COVID-19 restrictions.